Vote in the European Parliament
Draft amending budget no 2 to the general budget 2025 - Update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure
Overall Result
Adopted- 479 For
- 82 Against
- 77 Abstention
- 81 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (353 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2025/0206(BUD) · BUD
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Plenary
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (10)
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Referral to committee
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Update of revenues and expenditures for 2025
- Increase of GNI call rate to 0,547 %
- Adjustment of CAP payments by €3.5bn
Amendment history (5)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Rejected
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN
Added: 4 a. Regrets the lack of proposals from the Commission to reduce Union expenditure, particularly in the operating costs of administrations; considers it urgent to adopt an austerity plan that will enable the Union to reduce its debt without increasing the tax burden on taxpayers;
- Amendment 2Rejected
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN
Added: 4 b. Considers that the adoption of “own resources” for the European Union, which smacks of federalist ulterior motives, would encourage the pursuit of irresponsible, reckless spending;
- Amendment 3Rejected
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN
Added: 4 c. Considers it essential to maintain the principle that windfall gains and unspent amounts are returned to Member States at the end of the financial year;
- Amendment 4Rejected
Recital B
Tabled by Julien Sanchez, Auke Zijlstra, Angéline Furet +1 · PfE
… GNI base, which is 0,5 % higher than the May 2024 forecast, Added: which demonstrates misleading and imprudent budgetary forecasts,
- Amendment 5Rejected
Recital C
Tabled by Julien Sanchez, Auke Zijlstra, Angéline Furet +1 · PfE
… EUR 25 million compared to the estimate included in the 2025 budget, Added: which once again demonstrates that the initial budgetary forecast was overly optimistic and therefore imprudent and misleading,
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 8For
- 17Against
- 5Abstention
- 0Did not vote
- 53For
- 12Against
- 8Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 162For
- 0Against
- 9Abstention
- 17Did not vote
- 107For
- 2Against
- 5Abstention
- 22Did not vote
- 62For
- 4Against
- 2Abstention
- 7Did not vote
- 11For
- 22Against
- 43Abstention
- 9Did not vote
- 47For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 29For
- 2Against
- 4Abstention
- 11Did not vote
- 0For
- 23Against
- 1Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |