EN
FrançaisVote in the European Parliament
REPORT on possibilities for simplification of cohesion funds
Vladimir Prebilič – Motion for a resolution
Date: 10.09.2025Reference: A10-0138/2025cross-border cooperationEU investmentinformation systemregional and local authoritiesEU regional policysimplification of legislationauditregional developmentgovernanceperformance measurementstructural policyEU Cohesion Policy fundseconomic and social cohesion
Overall Result
Adopted- 513 For
- 111 Against
- 40 Abstention
- 55 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (490 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2024/2106(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (13)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Beneficiaries should have easier access to EU funding
- Cohesion funding should stay place-based, with a key role for local actors
- Consistently applied rules and single audits can reduce the administrative burden
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For21
- 21For
- 5Against
- 4Abstention
- 0Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For168
- 168For
- 6Against
- 1Abstention
- 13Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For128
- 128For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For43
- 43For
- 24Against
- 6Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For48
- 48For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For67
- 67For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 7Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For20
- 20For
- 2Against
- 4Abstention
- 1Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For10
- 10For
- 21Against
- 4Abstention
- 11Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For8
- 8For
- 52Against
- 21Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Poland | EPP | For | |
 Germany | S&D | For | |
 Latvia | S&D | For | |
| Poland | S&D | For | |
 Spain | EPP | For | |
 Italy | ECR | For | |
| Italy | S&D | For | |
 Lithuania | EPP | For | |
 Czechia | EPP | For | |
 Denmark | Greens/EFA | For |
