Vote in the European Parliament
Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies
Overall Result
Adopted- 542 For
- 97 Against
- 12 Abstention
- 68 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (471 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2025/0129(COD) · COD
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Signature
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (11)
- Committee amendments tabled
- Referral to committee
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Parliament’s first-reading position
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Signature
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Battery Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 to be tightened.
- Expanded due diligence obligations for economic operators.
- Parliament approves proposal unanimously.
Amendment history (4)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Rejected
Recital 2
Tabled by AnneSophie Frigout, Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone +6 · PfE
(2) At a time when the geopolitical landscape continues to shift,
Removed: various challenges need to be overcome, including in sourcing of raw materials. BatteryAdded: and the European Union, due to its dogmatic Green Deal and energy policies, is proving increasingly dependent on third countries for the supply of rare metals as well as for batteries and high value-added products, battery manufacturers need time to analyse and, where necessary, adjust their supply chains … - Amendment 2Rejected
Recital 2 a (new)
Tabled by Filip Turek, AnneSophie Frigout, Silvia Sardone +6 · PfE
Added: (2a) The combustion-engine vehicle industry is heavily penalised by the method for calculating CO₂ emissions set out in Regulation (EU) 2019/631, which is limited to emissions during use (mileage). That calculation excludes the carbon footprint generated upstream, in particular the extraction and refining of raw materials for battery manufacturing. That bias prevents a comprehensive assessment of the real carbon footprint of electric vehicles over their entire life cycle, highlighting the need to promptly review Regulation (EU) 2019/631.
- Amendment 3Rejected
Recital 2 b (new)
Tabled by AnneSophie Frigout, Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone +5 · PfE
Added: (2b) The battery industry is currently facing challenges to meet social and environmental vigilance requirements. It is therefore necessary to provide simplification to enhance the competitiveness of the Union battery industry and to urgently reconsider the ban on the sale of combustion engine vehicles planned for 2035, adopting an approach based on technological neutrality.
- Amendment 4Rejected
Recital 2 c (new)
Tabled by AnneSophie Frigout, Filip Turek, Mathilde Androuët +3 · PfE
Added: (2c) While the introduction of battery certification is a prerequisite for ensuring that electric mobility offers real environmental benefits, this tool must also become a lever for competitiveness for the European industry, in that it should shift competition beyond the sole criterion of price by promoting high standards.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 20For
- 4Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 73For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 175For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 12Did not vote
- 67For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 114For
- 3Against
- 1Abstention
- 18Did not vote
- 69For
- 0Against
- 8Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 24For
- 0Against
- 2Abstention
- 1Did not vote
- 0For
- 52Against
- 0Abstention
- 1Did not vote
- 0For
- 37Against
- 1Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |