Vote in the European Parliament

Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies

Antonio Decaro – Commission proposal
Date: 10.07.2025·Reference: A10-0134/2025
Rapporteur: Antonio Decaro

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 542 For
  • 97 Against
  • 12 Abstention
  • 68 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (471 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2025/0129(COD) · COD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage4 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Referral17 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Committee stageNext step on the same day
  4. Recorded: Plenary15 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Signature12 days until the next step
  6. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (11)
  1. Committee amendments tabled
  2. Referral to committee
  3. Committee report adopted
  4. Tabling for plenary
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Parliament’s first-reading position
  8. Plenary vote
  9. Plenary vote results
  10. Signature
  11. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Battery Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 to be tightened.
  • Expanded due diligence obligations for economic operators.
  • Parliament approves proposal unanimously.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Amendment history (4)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 1Rejected

    Recital 2

    Tabled by AnneSophie Frigout, Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone +6 · PfE

    (2) At a time when the geopolitical landscape continues to shift, Removed: various challenges need to be overcome, including in sourcing of raw materials. Battery Added: and the European Union, due to its dogmatic Green Deal and energy policies, is proving increasingly dependent on third countries for the supply of rare metals as well as for batteries and high value-added products, battery manufacturers need time to analyse and, where necessary, adjust their supply chains …

  2. Amendment 2Rejected

    Recital 2 a (new)

    Tabled by Filip Turek, AnneSophie Frigout, Silvia Sardone +6 · PfE

    Added: (2a) The combustion-engine vehicle industry is heavily penalised by the method for calculating CO₂ emissions set out in Regulation (EU) 2019/631, which is limited to emissions during use (mileage). That calculation excludes the carbon footprint generated upstream, in particular the extraction and refining of raw materials for battery manufacturing. That bias prevents a comprehensive assessment of the real carbon footprint of electric vehicles over their entire life cycle, highlighting the need to promptly review Regulation (EU) 2019/631.

  3. Amendment 3Rejected

    Recital 2 b (new)

    Tabled by AnneSophie Frigout, Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone +5 · PfE

    Added: (2b) The battery industry is currently facing challenges to meet social and environmental vigilance requirements. It is therefore necessary to provide simplification to enhance the competitiveness of the Union battery industry and to urgently reconsider the ban on the sale of combustion engine vehicles planned for 2035, adopting an approach based on technological neutrality.

  4. Amendment 4Rejected

    Recital 2 c (new)

    Tabled by AnneSophie Frigout, Filip Turek, Mathilde Androuët +3 · PfE

    Added: (2c) While the introduction of battery certification is a prerequisite for ensuring that electric mobility offers real environmental benefits, this tool must also become a lever for competitiveness for the European industry, in that it should shift competition beyond the sole criterion of price by promoting high standards.

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
ItalyECR
For
PolandECR
For
GermanyNI
For
GermanyEPP
For
GermanyRenew
For
BelgiumS&D
For
RomaniaEPP
For
FranceECR
For
NetherlandsPfE
For
PolandEPP
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en