Vote in the European Parliament
Product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU imports
Overall Result
Adopted- 619 For
- 26 Against
- 46 Abstention
- 28 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (499 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2037(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (11)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- 12 million small e-commerce packages arrive in the EU every day
- Incentivise bulk imports and convince non-EU platforms to set up and arrange shipments from warehouses inside the EU
- €2 handling fee for individual e-commerce packages could be useful, if compliant with WTO and not paid by EU consumers
Amendment history (2)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Rejected
Paragraph 33 a (new)
Tabled by Virginie Joron, Mathilde Androuët, Jordan Bardella +74 · Members
Added: 33a. Calls on the Commission to prioritise market surveillance and the fight against dangerous, non-compliant and counterfeit products in the implementation of the DSA;
- Amendment 2Rejected
Paragraph 39 a (new)
Tabled by Virginie Joron, Mathilde Androuët, Jordan Bardella +74 · Members
Added: 39a. Recalls the powers already conferred on market surveillance authorities in the current EU regulatory framework, in particular through Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and Regulation (EU) 2017/2394, such as the powers to prohibit or restrict the making available of a product on the market or to order a hosting service provider to remove, disable or restrict access to an online interface; considers that a revision of this regulatory framework is not necessary; calls instead on the national market surveillance authorities to make full use of the possibilities offered by these regulations so they can react swiftly to the challenges posed by the rapid emergence of operators from non-EU countries;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 23For
- 5Against
- 2Abstention
- 0Did not vote
- 178For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 9Did not vote
- 40For
- 0Against
- 3Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 51For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 69For
- 0Against
- 12Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 129For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 7Did not vote
- 73For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 55For
- 0Against
- 23Abstention
- 1Did not vote
- 1For
- 21Against
- 5Abstention
- 0Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |