Vote in the European Parliament
Draft amending budget no 1 to the general budget 2025 entering the surplus of the financial year 2024
Overall Result
Adopted- 534 For
- 102 Against
- 56 Abstention
- 27 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (427 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2025/0091(BUD) · BUD
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (10)
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Referral to committee
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- 2024 surplus of €1.345bn transferred to 2025 budget .
- Criticism of BNE contribution reduction due to surplus use.
- Demand for more flexible budget to address crises.
Amendment history (6)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Rejected
Paragraph 2
Tabled by Julien Sanchez, Tomasz Buczek, Jana Nagyová +1 · PfE
2.
Removed: WelcomesAdded: Notes the fact that the 2024 surplus is driven primarily by an increase … 4 (Financial revenue, default interest and fines), while the surplus of expenditureRemoved: remains very modest atAdded: amounts to EUR 273 million; - Amendment 2Rejected
Paragraph 3
Tabled by Julien Sanchez, Tomasz Buczek, Jana Nagyová +1 · PfE
3.
Removed: RegretsAdded: Welcomes the fact that the budgeting of the surplus reduces the total GNI-based own resources … - Amendment 3Rejected
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Tabled by Julien Sanchez, Tomasz Buczek, Jana Nagyová +1 · PfE
Added: 7 a. Opposes the adoption of new own resources, as matters stand, given that the situation regarding EU citizens’ purchasing power and European businesses is already critical; calls instead for better management of Union funds, particularly in relation to expenditure which goes beyond the Union’s powers, and for unnecessary expenditure to be done away with, and for genuine budgetary control so as to create significant fiscal headroom, particularly by acting on the many recommendations that have been rightly made by the European Court of Auditors;
- Amendment 4Rejected
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Tabled by Julien Sanchez, Tomasz Buczek, Jana Nagyová +1 · PfE
Added: 8 a. Stresses that the NextGenerationEU (NGEU) recovery instrument was conceived in haste, that it leaves the EU budget highly exposed until 2058; considers therefore that the Commission must take account of the observations made by the European Court of Auditors in order to make a proper assessment of the genuine effectiveness of investments made and to detect and prevent errors;
- Amendment 5Rejected
Recital D a (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN
Added: D a. whereas, given the EU’s level of indebtedness, the dramatic rise in interest costs, the absence of a repayment plan and the already heavy tax burden on European taxpayers, the only reasonable option is to allocate the entire budget surplus to the repayment of the NGEU loan;
- Amendment 6Rejected
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN
Added: 7 a. Rejects the creation of any new own resource that would burden European taxpayers; emphasises the need to drastically reduce EU spending to alleviate the tax burden and avoid passing on an even heavier burden to future generations due to the debt created by the “Next Generation EU” loan;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 17For
- 6Against
- 7Abstention
- 0Did not vote
- 172For
- 0Against
- 7Abstention
- 9Did not vote
- 39For
- 0Against
- 4Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 51For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 62For
- 12Against
- 3Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 124For
- 2Against
- 3Abstention
- 7Did not vote
- 57For
- 3Against
- 14Abstention
- 1Did not vote
- 12For
- 53Against
- 17Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 0For
- 26Against
- 1Abstention
- 0Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |