Vote in the European Parliament
Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market
Overall Result
Adopted- 306 For
- 80 Against
- 57 Abstention
- 276 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (556 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2542(RSP) · RSP
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (8)
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Single market as core pillar of European integration.
- Focus on competitiveness amid geopolitical and climate challenges.
- Demand for simplification and reduced bureaucracy for SMEs.
Amendment history (12)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
Recital E (new)
Tabled by Hanna Gedin · The Left
Added: E. whereas the green and digital transitions require an update to single market rules in order to set the right conditions to achieve a fairer, more sustainable and digitally fit EU; whereas regulatory tools must be aligned with those policy objectives; whereas single market rules to boost competitiveness must not come at the expense of safe and good-quality jobs within the EU;
Paragraph 5
Tabled by Hanna Gedin · The Left
5.
Removed: WelcomesAdded: Stresses that the proposal for a regulation on a public interface connected to the … workers and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 (COM/2024/531), which should lead toRemoved: simplification and strengthened enforcement; notes also that digitalisation could significantly reduce administrative burdens for cross-border services and ensure better access for businesses and consumers; calls, in this regard, for a single declaration portal and the digitalisation of A1 forms for cross-border services;Added: strengthened enforcement, must not lead to a decline in wages and working conditions and a race to the bottom;Paragraph 16
Tabled by Hanna Gedin · The Left
16. Considers that
Removed: the single market isAdded: State aid measures are a key tool in times ofRemoved: crisis if the Member States can act in a coordinated way;Added: crisis; highlights the key role that the relaxation of State aid rules played in keeping the EU single market afloat during the COVID-19 pandemic and during Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine; calls, therefore, for greater certainty and proactive measures in relaxing State aid rules for future crises that the Union may face, for the benefit of the single market; considers that the recently adopted Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Act2 will …Paragraph 29
Tabled by Hanna Gedin · The Left
… to protect consumers against greenwashing by establishing requirements for substantiation and verification; Added: stresses, against this background, the importance of maintaining and reinforcing sustainability laws such as the Green Claims Directive, the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive1a and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive1b; ______________ 1a OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/oj. 1b OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj.
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Tabled by Piotr Müller · ECR
Added: 2a. Highlights that ongoing barriers and political pressure to expand regulations have constrained the development of the single market, as noted in the Draghi report; calls for a shift towards a regulatory approach that empowers companies to grow, innovate and lead internationally, thereby restoring the single market as a true engine of growth and competitiveness;
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Tabled by Piotr Müller · ECR
Added: 2a. Highlights that ongoing barriers and political pressure to expand regulations have constrained the development of the single market, as noted in the Draghi report; calls for a shift towards a regulatory approach that empowers companies to grow, innovate and lead internationally, thereby restoring the single market as a true engine of growth and competitiveness;
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Tabled by Piotr Müller · ECR
Added: 21a. Stresses that the implementation of the DSA must fully respect freedom of expression; underlines that actions against illegal content must not restrict lawful speech and calls for proportionate and transparent enforcement to protect an open and democratic digital space;
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Tabled by Piotr Müller · ECR
Added: 21a. Stresses that the implementation of the DSA must fully respect freedom of expression; underlines that actions against illegal content must not restrict lawful speech and calls for proportionate and transparent enforcement to protect an open and democratic digital space;
Paragraph 35
Tabled by Piotr Müller · ECR
… for Ukraine’s gradual integration into the EU single market and sectoral programmes; Added: firmly opposes, however, any further liberalisation of trade with Ukraine beyond the current framework unless and until full alignment of production standards and regulatory requirements is achieved, particularly in the agricultural sector; stresses that any easing of customs duties or safeguard measures must remain strictly conditional on Ukraine meeting the EU’s rigorous standards and must be accompanied by clear guarantees of compensatory mechanisms, including subsidies, ensuring the protection and competitiveness of European producers operating within the EU; underlines that the Member States neighbouring Ukraine have been disproportionately affected by surging imports resulting from autonomous trade measures and must not bear the burden of unfair competition;
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Tabled by Klara Dostalova · PfE
Added: 15a. Stresses the need, in the current context of high inflation in the energy and food sectors, and as highlighted in the 2025 Consumer Conditions Scoreboard, to reduce the financial burden on consumers and businesses, particularly owing to the EU regulatory framework resulting from the European Green Deal; strongly calls for the adoption of targeted legislative measures to protect consumers and businesses against excessive energy costs and speculative manipulation;
Paragraph 24
Tabled by Klara Dostalova · PfE
… recent years; highlights the significance of Digital Product Passports in these processes; Added: urges the Commission to take legal action that would grant the Member States the discretion to impose fees on consignments in cases of heightened inflows from non-EU countries; calls, therefore, for a reinforced market surveillance framework and a revision of …
Paragraph 37 a (new)
Tabled by Klara Dostalova · PfE
Added: 37a. Emphasises that the exercise of simplification should not be limited to the anecdotal deletion of some excessive reporting requirements; calls on the Commission to put in place a real ‘SME test’ to conduct an in-depth assessment of the impact of recent and upcoming EU legislation on competitiveness, so as to identify and eliminate any redundant, excessive or contradictory regulatory requirements further burdening businesses; urges the Commission, in this regard, to present an ‘SME omnibus’ before the end of 2025;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 5For
- 2Against
- 7Abstention
- 15Did not vote
- 96For
- 1Against
- 4Abstention
- 87Did not vote
- 75For
- 0Against
- 3Abstention
- 58Did not vote
- 32For
- 3Against
- 19Abstention
- 26Did not vote
- 42For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 10Did not vote
- 54For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 21Did not vote
- 2For
- 32Against
- 21Abstention
- 30Did not vote
- 0For
- 19Against
- 2Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 0For
- 22Against
- 1Abstention
- 23Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |