EN
Deutsch
EspañolVote in the European Parliament
2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - Joint Undertakings
Overall Result
Adopted- 513 For
- 101 Against
- 39 Abstention
- 66 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (401 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2024/2031(DEC) · DEC
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Other activity
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (13)
- Referral to committee
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee report tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Other recorded activity
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Discharge granted for 7 EU joint undertakings in 2023.
- Court of Auditors confirms reliability of budget execution.
- Publication in Official Journal L required.
Amendment history (1)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Tabled by Julien Sanchez, Virginie Joron · PfE
Added: 12 a. Regrets that the discharges of the Joint Undertakings are no longer studied individually, which, in addition to being a lack of transparency, distorts the final vote on this resolution; points out that the individual study made it possible to better present the axes operating and failing by entity and to make an informed decision on the discharge for each of them and that the new operation is unfortunately much more opaque, some Joint Undertakings being barely mentioned, which is problematic;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)- 8For
- 8Against
- 7Abstention
- 7Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)- 121For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 15Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)- 48For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)- 171For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 17Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)- 38For
- 1Against
- 1Abstention
- 6Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)- 58For
- 15Against
- 3Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)- 69For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)- 0For
- 21Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)- 0For
- 55Against
- 28Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Denmark | S&D | For | |
 Italy | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Cyprus | S&D | For | |
 Malta | S&D | For | |
 France | S&D | For | |
 Netherlands | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Czechia | EPP | For | |
 Belgium | S&D | For | |
 Hungary | EPP | For | |
 Lithuania | EPP | For |
