Vote in the European Parliament
Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2023
Overall Result
Adopted- 473 For
- 59 Against
- 114 Abstention
- 73 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (591 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2024/2083(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (13)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- 2023 annual report on EU financial protection and fraud prevention.
- €1.9 billion lost to fraud and irregularities.
- Call for digital cooperation and stricter controls.
Amendment history (5)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 7Rejected
Recital F a (new)
Tabled by Virginie Joron, Mathilde Androuët, Julien Sanchez +1 · PfE
Added: Fa. whereas the Commission should not spend millions of euros financing ‘fake green’ NGOs to lobby the EU institutions (LIFE programme scandal);
- Amendment 8Rejected
Recital L a (new)
Tabled by Virginie Joron, Julien Sanchez, Nikola Bartůšek · PfE
Added: La. whereas the EU should not finance foreign countries or organisations in those countries that do not respect the EU’s key interests (refusal to take back their criminals expelled from Europe; financing of terrorism, etc.);
- Amendment 9Rejected
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Tabled by Virginie Joron, Mathilde Androuët, Julien Sanchez +1 · PfE
Added: 1a. Regrets how drastic and recurrent scandals have surfaced without any inquiry being conducted into potential conflicts of interest, disinformation or mistakes in the negotiation of contracts; highlights, for example: the EUR 71 billion spent on wasted COVID-19 vaccines and on remdesivir; the failure of the European Public Prosecutor’s office to act in the Pfizer-von der Leyen case; lobbyists/fake NGOs being financed by the Commission (LIFE scandal); the decision to contract Blackrock for a study on banking rules; the entrusting of EU officials’ recruitment contracts to an American firm; the authorised revolving door case of Thierry Breton joining an American bank; the Commissioner for Justice being found to have EUR 1 million-worth of Belgian lottery tickets; those accused of rape and harassment barely receiving any punishment; and the lack of consequences for receiving free flights and bags of money from Qatar;
- Amendment 14Rejected
Paragraph 36 a (new)
Tabled by Virginie Joron, Julien Sanchez, Nikola Bartůšek · PfE
Added: 36a. Calls for all NGOs to be audited to check whether they have a profit motive; notes that some reported remuneration of directors of NGOs seems excessive and requires further justification; notes that director(s) remuneration should be public; recalls that all NGOs that receive EU funds, directly or indirectly should fulfil the NGO definition of the 2024 financial regulation;
- Amendment 15Rejected
Paragraph 68 a (new)
Tabled by Virginie Joron, Julien Sanchez, Nikola Bartůšek · PfE
Added: 68a. Expresses deep concern over the case of former Director-General of DG MOVE, Henrik Hololei, who, according to media reports, was found by OLAF to have accepted flights and gifts from Qatar while leading negotiations on the EU-Qatar air transport agreement and disclosed confidential information in return; regrets that, despite OLAF forwarding its findings to the President of the Commission in July 2024, neither the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) nor the competent Belgian authorities seem to have taken up this matter; calls for an investigation into why this report had apparently not been shared with the relevant prosecutorial authorities by the Commission;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 5For
- 9Against
- 11Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 167For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 21Did not vote
- 127For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 9Did not vote
- 46For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 7Did not vote
- 24For
- 0Against
- 48Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 70For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 33For
- 2Against
- 1Abstention
- 10Did not vote
- 1For
- 21Against
- 1Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 0For
- 27Against
- 53Abstention
- 5Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |