Vote in the European Parliament

Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2023

A10–0049/2025 – Gilles Boyer – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Date: 06.05.2025·Reference: A10-0049/2025
Rapporteur: Gilles Boyer

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 473 For
  • 59 Against
  • 114 Abstention
  • 73 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (591 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2024/2083(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral20 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage104 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary591 days since this step began
Recorded activities (13)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Plenary debate
  12. Plenary vote
  13. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • 2023 annual report on EU financial protection and fraud prevention.
  • €1.9 billion lost to fraud and irregularities.
  • Call for digital cooperation and stricter controls.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Amendment history (5)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 7Rejected

    Recital F a (new)

    Tabled by Virginie Joron, Mathilde Androuët, Julien Sanchez +1 · PfE

    Added: Fa. whereas the Commission should not spend millions of euros financing ‘fake green’ NGOs to lobby the EU institutions (LIFE programme scandal);

  2. Amendment 8Rejected

    Recital L a (new)

    Tabled by Virginie Joron, Julien Sanchez, Nikola Bartůšek · PfE

    Added: La. whereas the EU should not finance foreign countries or organisations in those countries that do not respect the EU’s key interests (refusal to take back their criminals expelled from Europe; financing of terrorism, etc.);

  3. Amendment 9Rejected

    Paragraph 1 a (new)

    Tabled by Virginie Joron, Mathilde Androuët, Julien Sanchez +1 · PfE

    Added: 1a. Regrets how drastic and recurrent scandals have surfaced without any inquiry being conducted into potential conflicts of interest, disinformation or mistakes in the negotiation of contracts; highlights, for example: the EUR 71 billion spent on wasted COVID-19 vaccines and on remdesivir; the failure of the European Public Prosecutor’s office to act in the Pfizer-von der Leyen case; lobbyists/fake NGOs being financed by the Commission (LIFE scandal); the decision to contract Blackrock for a study on banking rules; the entrusting of EU officials’ recruitment contracts to an American firm; the authorised revolving door case of Thierry Breton joining an American bank; the Commissioner for Justice being found to have EUR 1 million-worth of Belgian lottery tickets; those accused of rape and harassment barely receiving any punishment; and the lack of consequences for receiving free flights and bags of money from Qatar;

  4. Amendment 14Rejected

    Paragraph 36 a (new)

    Tabled by Virginie Joron, Julien Sanchez, Nikola Bartůšek · PfE

    Added: 36a. Calls for all NGOs to be audited to check whether they have a profit motive; notes that some reported remuneration of directors of NGOs seems excessive and requires further justification; notes that director(s) remuneration should be public; recalls that all NGOs that receive EU funds, directly or indirectly should fulfil the NGO definition of the 2024 financial regulation;

  5. Amendment 15Rejected

    Paragraph 68 a (new)

    Tabled by Virginie Joron, Julien Sanchez, Nikola Bartůšek · PfE

    Added: 68a. Expresses deep concern over the case of former Director-General of DG MOVE, Henrik Hololei, who, according to media reports, was found by OLAF to have accepted flights and gifts from Qatar while leading negotiations on the EU-Qatar air transport agreement and disclosed confidential information in return; regrets that, despite OLAF forwarding its findings to the President of the Commission in July 2024, neither the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) nor the competent Belgian authorities seem to have taken up this matter; calls for an investigation into why this report had apparently not been shared with the relevant prosecutorial authorities by the Commission;

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
BelgiumEPP
For
LithuaniaEPP
For
GermanyS&D
For
FinlandS&D
For
ItalyS&D
For
GermanyS&D
For
GermanyGreens/EFA
For
CzechiaECR
For
BelgiumRenew
For
ItalyEPP
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en