ENVote in the European Parliament
Granting equivalence with EU requirements to Moldova and Ukraine as regards field inspections and production of seed
Overall Result
Adopted- 411 For
- 191 Against
- 13 Abstention
- 103 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (511 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2024/0027(COD) · COD
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Negotiations
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Signature
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (17)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary endorses start of interinstitutional negotiations
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Parliament’s first-reading position with amendments
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Signature
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Equivalence of Moldovan seed with EU standards.
- Ukraine granted equivalence for beet and oil plant seeds .
- Parliament approves amendments in first reading.
Amendment history (2)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
Recital 11 a (new)
Tabled by Gilles Pennelle · PfE
Added: (11 a) No impact assesment has been conducted to assess the economic consequences for the European seed sector.
Recital 11 b (new)
Tabled by Gilles Pennelle · PfE
Added: (11 b) Ukraine and Moldova do not have the same social and environmental standards as those imposed on European seed producers. This distortion of competition is not taken into account in this Regulation.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)- 3For
- 16Against
- 3Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)- 66For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 9Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)- 129For
- 27Against
- 1Abstention
- 31Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)- 51For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)- 117For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 19Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)- 28For
- 8Against
- 1Abstention
- 9Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)- 17For
- 43Against
- 6Abstention
- 14Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)- 0For
- 23Against
- 1Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)- 0For
- 74Against
- 1Abstention
- 11Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 718
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Bulgaria | Renew | For | |
 Romania | EPP | For | |
 France | Renew | For | |
 Italy | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Netherlands | EPP | For | |
 Spain | EPP | For | |
| Bulgaria | EPP | For | |
 Germany | S&D | For | |
| Italy | S&D | For | |
 Finland | S&D | For |
