Vote in the European Parliament

Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024

Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49 – Am 133
Date: 02.04.2025·Reference: A10-0011/2025
Rapporteur: Nicolás Pascual de la Parte

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 206 For
  • 442 Against
  • 15 Abstention
  • 55 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 133 · Tabled by ECRView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Michał Dworczyk, Adam Bielan, Reinis Pozņaks

… that, in order to become a credible geopolitical player, the EU should Removed: reform its process for decision-making on the CFSP/CSDP and underlines, in this regard, that institutional reflections on lifting the requirement for unanimity in this process should be considered; Added: strengthen the common threat perception, and with it the unity and solidarity needed to overcome the lack of decisiveness and willingness to act decisively on security, in particular in the immediate neighbourhood; recalls that the EU Treaty framework already allows a number of different … CFSP/CSDP with a view to realising the untapped potential within the Treaties; Removed: reiterates its call for the Council to gradually switch to qualified majority voting for decisions on the CFSP and CSDP, at least in those areas that do not have military implications; suggests, furthermore, that the Council pursue making full use of the ‘passerelle …

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE769.721v01-00

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (641 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2024/2082(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage48 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Referral63 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Committee stage11 days until the next step
  4. Latest recorded: Plenary641 days since this step began
Recorded activities (8)
  1. Committee report tabled
  2. Committee amendments tabled
  3. Referral to committee
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Plenary debate
  7. Plenary vote
  8. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • 2024 GSVP implementation report presented.
  • Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine as main threat identified.
  • Call for strategic autonomy and increased defense spending.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 718

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
NetherlandsECR
For
IrelandRenew
For
FrancePfE
For
FrancePfE
For
GermanyNI
For
SloveniaEPP
For
PolandECR
For
PortugalPfE
For
CzechiaPfE
For
GermanyNI
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en