Vote in the European Parliament
Protocol on the Implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (2024-2029)
Overall Result
Adopted- 605 For
- 68 Against
- 10 Abstention
- 35 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (541 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2024/0159(NLE) · NLE
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Other activity
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (12)
- Committee opinion tabled
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Other recorded activity
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Approval of the new EU-Guinea-Bissau fisheries agreement (2024-2029).
- Emphasis on sustainability and local development.
- Financial support of €17 million annually .
Amendment history (1)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 2Rejected
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Tabled by Mélissa Camara · Verts/ALE
Added: 10a. Recognises that flags of convenience undermine transparency and accountability in the fisheries sector, enabling IUU fishing, tax evasion and labour exploitation; recalls that their continued use allows vessel owners to circumvent EU fishing regulations and weakens enforcement mechanisms essential for sustainable fisheries management; calls on the Member States to take all necessary measures to closely monitor and put an end to the use of flags of convenience for fishing vessels;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 15For
- 6Against
- 3Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 46For
- 34Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 42For
- 0Against
- 2Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 70For
- 6Against
- 2Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 178For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 9Did not vote
- 72For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 51For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 130For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 1For
- 20Against
- 3Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 718
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |