Vote in the European Parliament

Assessment of the implementation of Horizon Europe in view of its interim evaluation and recommendations for the 10th Research Framework Programme

Christian Ehler – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Date: 11.03.2025·Reference: A10-0021/2025
Rapporteur: Christian Ehler

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 472 For
  • 75 Against
  • 92 Abstention
  • 80 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (625 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2024/2109(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage14 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Referral7 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Committee stage83 days until the next step
  4. Latest recorded: Plenary625 days since this step began
Recorded activities (8)
  1. Committee report tabled
  2. Referral to committee
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Plenary vote
  8. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Evaluation of Horizon Europe as EU's largest research program.
  • Recommendations for FRP10 with €200–220 billion budget.
  • Focus on competitiveness and innovation gap by 2035 .
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Amendment history (4)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 1Rejected

    Paragraph 4 a (new)

    Tabled by Filip Turek, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +83 · Members

    Added: 4a. Deplores the fact that, due to Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/25061a, the entities financed by Hungarian public interest trust foundations, notably 21 Hungarian universities and 1 Austrian university, are prevented from receiving direct EU funding, including Horizon Europe funds; notes, therefore, that, other than consortia members, they are excluded from participating in Horizon Europe; underlines that the framework programme must ensure that all researchers have the opportunity to participate, regardless of their nationality and place of employment; warns that this decision and its excessively strict interpretation are damaging European R&I cooperation and urges the Commission, for this reason, to present without delay, following swift and constructive negotiations with all stakeholders concerned, a proposal to withdraw Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506; ______________ 1a Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 of 15 December 2022 on measures for the protection of the Union budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary, OJ L 325, 20.12.2022, p. 94, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2022/2506/oj.

  2. Amendment 2Rejected

    Paragraph 51 a (new)

    Tabled by Filip Turek, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +74 · Members

    Added: 51a. Insists on the urgent need to refocus European research programmes on the objectives of economic competitiveness, strategic autonomy and cutting-edge innovation, which requires the immediate discontinuation of programmes that contribute neither to technological sovereignty nor to scientific leadership, divert resources from technological progress and undermine the credibility of research in Europe, such as the following projects: ‘Fostering Queer Feminist Intersectional Resistances against Transnational Anti-Gender Politics’ (EUR 2.38 million), ‘YOUth Debunking the gendered Arguments of far-Right Extremism’ (EUR 2.9 million), ‘White Islam: A New Religion for Europeans’ (EUR 271 052), ‘Eco-Islam in Indonesia: Media, Institutions, Publics’ (EUR 2 million) and ‘Superstition, Material Religion and Hıdrellez in Turkey’ (EUR 254 330);

  3. Amendment 3Rejected

    Paragraph 57 a (new)

    Tabled by Filip Turek, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +74 · Members

    Added: 57a. Stresses the importance of greater reciprocity in association agreements with non-EU countries to ensure equivalent access for European entities, particularly SMEs, to the research programmes of associated non-EU countries; calls for better use of financial adjustment tools in cases of significant imbalances in funding received by entities from associated countries as well as a stricter monitoring and control mechanism to balance openness with the security of European researchers and the protection of investments; stresses, furthermore, the need for a systematic risk-based partner screening to assess the compliance of foreign entities with intellectual property protection, research ethics and reciprocity principles;

  4. Amendment 4Rejected

    Paragraph 57 b (new)

    Tabled by Filip Turek, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +74 · Members

    Added: 57b. Calls for greater consideration to be given to the risks to economic security, particularly when entities from associated and non-associated non-EU countries are involved; stresses, in this regard, that the use of the ‘as open as possible, as closed as necessary’ principle as enshrined in the Council Recommendation of 23 May 2024 on enhancing research security1a be accompanied by systematic oversight to ensure that openness in European partnerships does not compromise the Union’s strategic interests, particularly in key technological and industrial research areas; ______________ 1a OJ C, C/2024/3510, 30.5.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3510/oj.

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
SpainS&D
For
GreeceEPP
For
AustriaRenew
For
BelgiumRenew
For
GreeceEPP
For
MaltaS&D
For
SpainECR
For
AustriaEPP
For
PolandEPP
For
SpainGreens/EFA
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en