Vote in the European Parliament
Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3) authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize MON 95275 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Overall Result
Adopted- 467 For
- 156 Against
- 18 Abstention
- 78 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (646 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2024/3011(RSP) · RSP
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (4)
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Objection to approval of genetically modified maize MON 95275 .
- Missing data on environmental impacts and non-target organisms .
- Demand for withdrawal of Commission draft .
Amendment history (4)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
Recital M a (new)
Tabled by Emma Fourreau, Manon Aubry, Anja Hazekamp · The Left
Added: Ma. whereas the trade agreement between the EU and Mercosur will incentivise imports to the Union of food and animal feed containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified organisms, whereas Brazil and Argentina are among the world’s top GMO producers and pesticide users, including GMOs and pesticides banned in the Union for health or environmental reasons;
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Tabled by Emma Fourreau, Manon Aubry, Anja Hazekamp · The Left
Added: 4a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to definitively abandon the signing of the EU-Mercosur agreement as it poses significant risks to health and the environment, undermines the Union’s agricultural sovereignty and is detrimental to farmers;
Recital J a (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN
Added: Ja. whereas by authorising the import of products whose cultivation is prohibited within the Union, in particular genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the Commission is contributing to the creation of conditions of unfair competition; whereas this creates a competitive imbalance that penalises European farmers and undermines the Union’s food sovereignty;
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN
Added: 5a. Calls on the Commission to listen to farmers’ demands, particularly those made during the demonstrations in 2023, 2024 and 2025, and to ban the import of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the cultivation of which is itself banned within the Union;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 24For
- 1Against
- 3Abstention
- 1Did not vote
- 118For
- 2Against
- 1Abstention
- 15Did not vote
- 50For
- 0Against
- 2Abstention
- 1Did not vote
- 55For
- 13Against
- 1Abstention
- 11Did not vote
- 40For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 75For
- 7Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 57For
- 96Against
- 11Abstention
- 24Did not vote
- 29For
- 37Against
- 0Abstention
- 9Did not vote
- 19For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 7Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |