Vote in the European Parliament

Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3) authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize MON 95275 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council

Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Date: 12.02.2025·Reference: B10-0060/2025
Rapporteur: Biljana Borzan, Martin Häusling, Anja Hazekamp

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 467 For
  • 156 Against
  • 18 Abstention
  • 78 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (646 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2024/3011(RSP) · RSP

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Latest recorded: Plenary646 days since this step began
Recorded activities (4)
  1. Tabling for plenary
  2. Tabling for plenary
  3. Plenary vote
  4. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Objection to approval of genetically modified maize MON 95275 .
  • Missing data on environmental impacts and non-target organisms .
  • Demand for withdrawal of Commission draft .
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Amendment history (4)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 2 · Motion for a resolution B10-0060/2025 (ENVI Committee)Adopted

    Recital M a (new)

    Tabled by Emma Fourreau, Manon Aubry, Anja Hazekamp · The Left

    Added: Ma. whereas the trade agreement between the EU and Mercosur will incentivise imports to the Union of food and animal feed containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified organisms, whereas Brazil and Argentina are among the world’s top GMO producers and pesticide users, including GMOs and pesticides banned in the Union for health or environmental reasons;

  2. Amendment 3 · Motion for a resolution B10-0060/2025 (ENVI Committee)Rejected

    Paragraph 4 a (new)

    Tabled by Emma Fourreau, Manon Aubry, Anja Hazekamp · The Left

    Added: 4a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to definitively abandon the signing of the EU-Mercosur agreement as it poses significant risks to health and the environment, undermines the Union’s agricultural sovereignty and is detrimental to farmers;

  3. Amendment 4 · Motion for a resolution B10-0060/2025 (ENVI Committee)Rejected

    Recital J a (new)

    Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN

    Added: Ja. whereas by authorising the import of products whose cultivation is prohibited within the Union, in particular genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the Commission is contributing to the creation of conditions of unfair competition; whereas this creates a competitive imbalance that penalises European farmers and undermines the Union’s food sovereignty;

  4. Amendment 5 · Motion for a resolution B10-0060/2025 (ENVI Committee)Rejected

    Paragraph 5 a (new)

    Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN

    Added: 5a. Calls on the Commission to listen to farmers’ demands, particularly those made during the demonstrations in 2023, 2024 and 2025, and to ban the import of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the cultivation of which is itself banned within the Union;

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
GermanyS&D
For
NetherlandsGreens/EFA
For
ItalyECR
For
ItalyGUE/NGL
For
ItalyPfE
For
CzechiaPfE
For
PolandEPP
For
GermanyNI
For
HungaryPfE
For
SwedenS&D
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en