EN
Español
Français
ItalianoVote in the European Parliament
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council RESTORE – Regional Emergency Support to Reconstruction amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1058 and Regulation (EU) 2021/1057
Andrzej Buła, Younous Omarjee – Commission proposal
Date: 17.12.2024Reference: A10-0031/2024regional aideligibility criteriaclean technologynatural disasterEuropean Social FundEU regional policyEuropean Regional Development FundEuropean Union Solidarity Fundless-favoured regioneconomic and social cohesiondegradation of the environment
Overall Result
Adopted- 638 For
- 10 Against
- 5 Abstention
- 66 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (690 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2024/0275(COD) · COD
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Signature
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (14)
- Committee opinion tabled
- Referral to committee
- Plenary vote
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Parliament’s first-reading position with amendments
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Signature
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Vote on the request for urgent procedure
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Regional development funds can be used more flexibly for reconstruction following natural disasters
- Social funds can also finance post-disaster healthcare and basic necessities
- Losses for farmers, forest holders and SMEs active in agriculture and forestry can be compensated
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For26
- 26For
- 0Against
- 3Abstention
- 1Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For60
- 60For
- 4Against
- 2Abstention
- 12Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For75
- 75For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For122
- 122For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 14Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For43
- 43For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For167
- 167For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 21Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For74
- 74For
- 6Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For49
- 49For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For22
- 22For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Poland | ECR | For | |
 Slovakia | Renew | For | |
 Austria | Renew | For | |
 Denmark | S&D | For | |
 Sweden | Renew | For | |
 Germany | GUE/NGL | For | |
| Germany | S&D | For | |
 Bulgaria | Renew | For | |
 Slovenia | EPP | For | |
 Czechia | PfE | For |
