EN
ItalianoVote in the European Parliament
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2020/2220 as regards specific measures under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) to provide additional assistance to Member States affected by natural disasters
Veronika Vrecionová – Commission proposal
Date: 17.12.2024Reference: A10-0026/2024eligibility criteriaEAFRDclimate change policynatural disasteragricultural expendituredegradation of the environmentaid to agricultureEAGFEU Member State
Overall Result
Adopted- 644 For
- 6 Against
- 3 Abstention
- 66 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (690 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2024/0274(COD) · COD
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Signature
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (12)
- Referral to committee
- Committee opinion tabled
- Plenary vote
- Committee report tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Parliament’s first-reading position
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Signature
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Vote on the request for urgent procedure
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Regional development funds can be used more flexibly for reconstruction following natural disasters
- Social funds can also finance post-disaster healthcare and basic necessities
- Losses for farmers, forest holders and SMEs active in agriculture and forestry can be compensated
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For30
- 30For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 0Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For168
- 168For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 20Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For122
- 122For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 13Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For79
- 79For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For71
- 71For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For42
- 42For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For22
- 22For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For61
- 61For
- 2Against
- 3Abstention
- 12Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For49
- 49For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Lithuania | EPP | For | |
 Germany | S&D | For | |
 Greece | NI | For | |
 Czechia | PfE | For | |
 Portugal | EPP | For | |
 Spain | EPP | For | |
 Sweden | Renew | For | |
 Netherlands | EPP | For | |
 France | S&D | For | |
| France | EPP | For |
