Vote in the European Parliament
Draft amending budget no 4 to the general budget 2024 - update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to some decentralised agencies
Overall Result
Adopted- 522 For
- 115 Against
- 25 Abstention
- 57 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (703 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2024/0185(BUD) · BUD
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (7)
- Committee report tabled
- Referral to committee
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Update of revenue and expenditure for 2024 .
- GNI contributions rise by €5.63bn due to deviations.
- Criticism of rebates for five member states.
Amendment history (1)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Rejected
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Tabled by Julien Sanchez · PfE
Added: 5 a. Regrets the lack of transparency in the negotiation of the sublease contract for the former headquarters of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in London with the company WeWork, a renegotiation which has led to substantial revenue losses for the EMA; regrets the Union’s balancing contribution to the EMA to compensate for the decrease in rental income from the building as a result of that questionable and opaque renegotiation; calls on the European Court of Auditors to carefully examine the compliance of the renegotiated lease contract, particularly in light of the principles of sound financial management and transparency, as well as the conditions under which it was drafted;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 1For
- 21Against
- 4Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 51For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 37For
- 1Against
- 5Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 13For
- 61Against
- 7Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 170For
- 0Against
- 2Abstention
- 16Did not vote
- 124For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 12Did not vote
- 67For
- 0Against
- 3Abstention
- 7Did not vote
- 58For
- 11Against
- 4Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 1For
- 21Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |