Vote in the European Parliament
Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2025 – Section I – European Parliament
Overall Result
Adopted- 338 For
- 148 Against
- 46 Abstention
- 173 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (935 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2023/2221(BUI) · BUI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (5)
- Committee report tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Parliament’s 2025 draft budget: €2.5bn (+4.87 %).
- Focus on energy efficiency and sustainability of buildings.
- Support for visitor groups and multilingualism prioritised.
Amendment history (8)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Rejected
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Tabled by Francisco Guerreiro · Verts/ALE
Added: 16a. Regrets that the call by plenary to introduce a cooling-off period for former Members equal to the time during which they receive a transitional allowance during which they cannot engage in lobbying or representational activities with Parliament was not taken up and calls for this to be urgently rectified;
- Amendment 2Rejected
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Tabled by Francisco Guerreiro · Verts/ALE
Added: 16b. Believes no General Expenditure Allowance should be paid to former Members; calls therefore for the deletion of Article 42, subparagraph 4, of the Implementing Measures of the Members' Statute as a matter of urgency;
- Amendment 3Rejected
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Tabled by Younous Omarjee, Manu Pineda, Marc Botenga +2 · The Left
Added: 27a. Highlights that subcontracting cleaning, catering, crèches and travel agency services puts people, mainly women, in an extremely vulnerable position; calls for the internalisation of cleaning, catering, crèches and travel agency staff as soon as possible;
- Amendment 4Rejected
Paragraph 27 b (new)
Tabled by Sandra Pereira, João Pimenta Lopes, José Gusmão +3 · The Left
Added: 27b. Notes with concern the decision of the company managing the Parliament crèche in Brussels to terminate its contract; highlights that the continuous changes of contractors bring uncertainty for the staff, the children and their parents and increase health and safety risks; calls for Parliament to ensure the proper functioning of the crèche thereby protecting the staff, ensuring decent working conditions and fair remuneration, and the quality of the services and to take the necessary steps to allow for the crèche staff to be directly employed by Parliament;
- Amendment 5Rejected
Paragraph 27 c (new)
Tabled by José Gusmão, Anabela Rodrigues, Younous Omarjee · The Left
Added: 27c. Reiterates that any new calls for tenders should take into account the guidance on socially responsible public procurement recently adopted at the European Parliament.
- Amendment 6Adopted
Paragraph 27 b (new)
Tabled by João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left
Added: Calls for a genuine commitment to achieving the principle of multilingualism; to this end, calls for an increase in funding for the European Parliament’s translation and interpretation services, ensuring that their staff members are recruited to established internal European Parliament posts;
- Amendment 6Rejected
Paragraph 27 b (new)
Tabled by João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left
Added: Calls for a genuine commitment to achieving the principle of multilingualism; to this end, calls for an increase in funding for the European Parliament’s translation and interpretation services, ensuring that their staff members are recruited to established internal European Parliament posts;
- Amendment 8Rejected
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Tabled by Joachim Kuhs, Valentino Grant, Eric Minardi · ID
Added: 3a. Stresses that savings are firmly required and deplores the fact that Parliament’s budget has increased steadily year on year during the last parliamentary terms; calls, therefore, for Parliament to set as the main objective for its own budget the curbing of its own costs as much as possible and seeking significant savings, in order to send out a message of solidarity to Union citizens
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 123For
- 6Against
- 6Abstention
- 42Did not vote
- 82For
- 8Against
- 0Abstention
- 12Did not vote
- 37For
- 77Against
- 20Abstention
- 50Did not vote
- 84For
- 6Against
- 9Abstention
- 41Did not vote
- 11For
- 6Against
- 3Abstention
- 11Did not vote
- 1For
- 0Against
- 6Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 0For
- 27Against
- 1Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 0For
- 18Against
- 1Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |