Vote in the European Parliament

Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2025 – Section I – European Parliament

Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)
Date: 25.04.2024·Reference: A9-0180/2024
Rapporteur: Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 338 For
  • 148 Against
  • 46 Abstention
  • 173 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (935 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2023/2221(BUI) · BUI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage53 days until the next step
  2. Latest recorded: Plenary935 days since this step began
Recorded activities (5)
  1. Committee report tabled
  2. Committee report adopted
  3. Tabling for plenary
  4. Plenary vote
  5. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Parliament’s 2025 draft budget: €2.5bn (+4.87 %).
  • Focus on energy efficiency and sustainability of buildings.
  • Support for visitor groups and multilingualism prioritised.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Amendment history (8)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 1Rejected

    Paragraph 16 a (new)

    Tabled by Francisco Guerreiro · Verts/ALE

    Added: 16a. Regrets that the call by plenary to introduce a cooling-off period for former Members equal to the time during which they receive a transitional allowance during which they cannot engage in lobbying or representational activities with Parliament was not taken up and calls for this to be urgently rectified;

  2. Amendment 2Rejected

    Paragraph 16 b (new)

    Tabled by Francisco Guerreiro · Verts/ALE

    Added: 16b. Believes no General Expenditure Allowance should be paid to former Members; calls therefore for the deletion of Article 42, subparagraph 4, of the Implementing Measures of the Members' Statute as a matter of urgency;

  3. Amendment 3Rejected

    Paragraph 27 a (new)

    Tabled by Younous Omarjee, Manu Pineda, Marc Botenga +2 · The Left

    Added: 27a. Highlights that subcontracting cleaning, catering, crèches and travel agency services puts people, mainly women, in an extremely vulnerable position; calls for the internalisation of cleaning, catering, crèches and travel agency staff as soon as possible;

  4. Amendment 4Rejected

    Paragraph 27 b (new)

    Tabled by Sandra Pereira, João Pimenta Lopes, José Gusmão +3 · The Left

    Added: 27b. Notes with concern the decision of the company managing the Parliament crèche in Brussels to terminate its contract; highlights that the continuous changes of contractors bring uncertainty for the staff, the children and their parents and increase health and safety risks; calls for Parliament to ensure the proper functioning of the crèche thereby protecting the staff, ensuring decent working conditions and fair remuneration, and the quality of the services and to take the necessary steps to allow for the crèche staff to be directly employed by Parliament;

  5. Amendment 5Rejected

    Paragraph 27 c (new)

    Tabled by José Gusmão, Anabela Rodrigues, Younous Omarjee · The Left

    Added: 27c. Reiterates that any new calls for tenders should take into account the guidance on socially responsible public procurement recently adopted at the European Parliament.

  6. Amendment 6Adopted

    Paragraph 27 b (new)

    Tabled by João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left

    Added: Calls for a genuine commitment to achieving the principle of multilingualism; to this end, calls for an increase in funding for the European Parliament’s translation and interpretation services, ensuring that their staff members are recruited to established internal European Parliament posts;

  7. Amendment 6Rejected

    Paragraph 27 b (new)

    Tabled by João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left

    Added: Calls for a genuine commitment to achieving the principle of multilingualism; to this end, calls for an increase in funding for the European Parliament’s translation and interpretation services, ensuring that their staff members are recruited to established internal European Parliament posts;

  8. Amendment 8Rejected

    Paragraph 3 a (new)

    Tabled by Joachim Kuhs, Valentino Grant, Eric Minardi · ID

    Added: 3a. Stresses that savings are firmly required and deplores the fact that Parliament’s budget has increased steadily year on year during the last parliamentary terms; calls, therefore, for Parliament to set as the main objective for its own budget the curbing of its own costs as much as possible and seeking significant savings, in order to send out a message of solidarity to Union citizens

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 705

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
SlovakiaEPP
For
CroatiaEPP
For
RomaniaRenew
For
FranceRenew
For
ItalyNI
For
SpainS&D
For
GermanyEPP
For
EstoniaS&D
For
FranceRenew
For
LithuaniaEPP
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en