Vote in the European Parliament

2022 discharge: General budget of the EU - European Council and Council

Luke Ming Flanagan – Proposal for a decision
Date: 23.04.2024·Reference: A9-0071/2024
Rapporteur: Luke Ming Flanagan

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 539 For
  • 26 Against
  • 29 Abstention
  • 111 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Other activity · (752 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2023/2131(DEC) · DEC

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral86 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage90 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Plenary140 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Committee stage71 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Plenary7 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Official Journal12 days until the next step
  7. Recorded: PlenaryNext step on the same day
  8. Latest recorded: Other activity752 days since this step began
Recorded activities (17)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee opinion adopted
  3. Committee report tabled
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Plenary debate
  7. Plenary vote
  8. Plenary vote results
  9. Plenary vote
  10. Plenary vote results
  11. Committee report tabled
  12. Committee report adopted
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Publication in the Official Journal
  15. Other recorded activity
  16. Plenary vote
  17. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote
  3. Plenary vote
  4. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Discharge procedure for 2022 budget postponed.
  • Criticism of Council’s lack of transparency and cooperation .
  • Demand for clearer budget separation .
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Amendment history (1)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 1 · Motion for a resolutionAdopted

    Paragraph 16 a (new)

    Tabled by Jozef Mihál · Renew

    Added: 16a. Recalls that since Russia has been carrying out an illegal, unprovoked, and unjustified full-scale war of aggression against Ukraine since 24 February 2022, the EU and its Member States have pledged assistance to Ukraine and its people; recalls the ammunition initiative, which initially aimed to provide 1 million rounds of 155 mm shells to Ukraine by March 2024 but delivered only approximately half of that amount by that date; urges the Commission and Member States to significantly accelerate the manufacturing, procurement, and delivery of ammunition to Ukraine without delay; points out that the Ukrainian government has requested European allies to supply them with 7 out of around 30 Patriot anti-missile systems available in EU Member States to more adequately protect civilian infrastructure against the Russian aggression; regrets that to date only one Member State has pledged an additional system and urges the European Council to expedite the decision-making process and allocate resources to provide Ukraine with necessary air defence capabilities; underscores that Parliament will not grant discharge of the Council for failure to implement Parliament’s recommendations and for as long as the necessary support for Ukraine is not adequately budgeted; reaffirms its solidarity with Ukraine and emphasizes the importance of decisive action by European leaders to address the urgent security needs of our Ukrainian partners;

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 705

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
FranceGreens/EFA
For
MaltaS&D
For
ItalyECR
For
SpainRenew
For
FranceRenew
For
DenmarkRenew
For
PortugalEPP
For
PolandEPP
For
FranceNI
For
SpainS&D
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en