Vote in the European Parliament
2022 discharge: European Border and Coast Guard Agency
Overall Result
Adopted- 387 For
- 104 Against
- 107 Abstention
- 107 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (765 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2023/2172(DEC) · DEC
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Other activity
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (11)
- Referral to committee
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Other recorded activity
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Discharge granted for Frontex 2022 budget by EU Parliament.
- 29.5 % budget increase in 2022 to €693 million for expanded border tasks.
- Criticism of human rights violations and slow reform implementation.
Amendment history (5)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Tabled by Dominique Bilde, Matteo Adinolfi, Joachim Kuhs +1 · ID
Added: 4 a. Notes that approximately EUR 2 million is allocated to monitoring fundamental rights; criticises the fact that those funds are not channelled into the Agency’s core mission;
Paragraph 14
Tabled by Joachim Kuhs, Dominique Bilde, Matteo Adinolfi +1 · ID
14. Notes Added: with concern that around 330 000 illegal border crossings were detected at the EU´s external border in 2022, only according to preliminary calculations; underlines that this the highest number since 2016 and an increase of 64 % compared to the previous year; notes that operational activities conducted on land borders in 2022 resulted in approximately 49 000 incidents reported, involving more than 26 000 apprehended
Removed: irregularAdded: illegal migrants and 700 smugglers arrested; notes the Agency’s efforts that led to … 2021) by 8 789 scheduled flights to 116 countries of return; notes Added: that this number is marginal in comparison to the total number of illegal border crossings occurred in 2022; notes further the Agency’s efforts under all maritime joint operations in 2022 which … 1 105 facilitators and 11 traffickers of human beings, the seizure ofRemoved: tens ofAdded: 96 tons of smuggled drugs and the rescue of thousands of migrants; notes, …Paragraph 14 a (new)
Tabled by Joachim Kuhs, Dominique Bilde, Matteo Adinolfi +1 · ID
Added: 14 a. Takes note of sea operations, during which 53 000 people were rescued compared to 11 650 people in 2021; highlights a statistical explosion of illegal border crossings by both land and sea in 2022 and reaching 331 553 compared to 200 101 in 2021; urges an imminent change of EU migration policy;
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Tabled by Dominique Bilde, Matteo Adinolfi, Joachim Kuhs +1 · ID
Added: 14 b. Stresses the importance of providing adequate funding to build physical barriers along the European Union’s external borders in order to prevent migrants from entering illegally;
Paragraph 14 c (new)
Tabled by Dominique Bilde, Matteo Adinolfi, Joachim Kuhs +1 · ID
Added: 14 c. Calls for the possibility of processing asylum applications in countries of origin and transit in order to avoid fuelling migration into the Union;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 105For
- 1Against
- 16Abstention
- 17Did not vote
- 136For
- 6Against
- 1Abstention
- 34Did not vote
- 87For
- 3Against
- 0Abstention
- 12Did not vote
- 21For
- 6Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 38For
- 62Against
- 54Abstention
- 31Did not vote
- 0For
- 19Against
- 4Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 0For
- 6Against
- 5Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 0For
- 1Against
- 27Abstention
- 5Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |