Vote in the European Parliament

2022 discharge: European Border and Coast Guard Agency

Petri Sarvamaa – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Date: 11.04.2024·Reference: A9-0113/2024
Rapporteur: Petri Sarvamaa

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 387 For
  • 104 Against
  • 107 Abstention
  • 107 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (765 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2023/2172(DEC) · DEC

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral69 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage114 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Plenary29 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Other activity182 days until the next step
  5. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (11)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee opinion tabled
  3. Committee opinion adopted
  4. Committee report tabled
  5. Committee report adopted
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Plenary debate
  8. Other recorded activity
  9. Plenary vote
  10. Plenary vote results
  11. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Discharge granted for Frontex 2022 budget by EU Parliament.
  • 29.5 % budget increase in 2022 to €693 million for expanded border tasks.
  • Criticism of human rights violations and slow reform implementation.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Amendment history (5)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 3 · Motion for a resolutionRejected

    Paragraph 4 a (new)

    Tabled by Dominique Bilde, Matteo Adinolfi, Joachim Kuhs +1 · ID

    Added: 4 a. Notes that approximately EUR 2 million is allocated to monitoring fundamental rights; criticises the fact that those funds are not channelled into the Agency’s core mission;

  2. Amendment 7 · Motion for a resolutionRejected

    Paragraph 14

    Tabled by Joachim Kuhs, Dominique Bilde, Matteo Adinolfi +1 · ID

    14. Notes Added: with concern that around 330 000 illegal border crossings were detected at the EU´s external border in 2022, only according to preliminary calculations; underlines that this the highest number since 2016 and an increase of 64 % compared to the previous year; notes that operational activities conducted on land borders in 2022 resulted in approximately 49 000 incidents reported, involving more than 26 000 apprehended Removed: irregular Added: illegal migrants and 700 smugglers arrested; notes the Agency’s efforts that led to … 2021) by 8 789 scheduled flights to 116 countries of return; notes Added: that this number is marginal in comparison to the total number of illegal border crossings occurred in 2022; notes further the Agency’s efforts under all maritime joint operations in 2022 which … 1 105 facilitators and 11 traffickers of human beings, the seizure of Removed: tens of Added: 96 tons of smuggled drugs and the rescue of thousands of migrants; notes, …

  3. Amendment 8 · Motion for a resolutionRejected

    Paragraph 14 a (new)

    Tabled by Joachim Kuhs, Dominique Bilde, Matteo Adinolfi +1 · ID

    Added: 14 a. Takes note of sea operations, during which 53 000 people were rescued compared to 11 650 people in 2021; highlights a statistical explosion of illegal border crossings by both land and sea in 2022 and reaching 331 553 compared to 200 101 in 2021; urges an imminent change of EU migration policy;

  4. Amendment 9 · Motion for a resolutionRejected

    Paragraph 14 b (new)

    Tabled by Dominique Bilde, Matteo Adinolfi, Joachim Kuhs +1 · ID

    Added: 14 b. Stresses the importance of providing adequate funding to build physical barriers along the European Union’s external borders in order to prevent migrants from entering illegally;

  5. Amendment 10 · Motion for a resolutionRejected

    Paragraph 14 c (new)

    Tabled by Dominique Bilde, Matteo Adinolfi, Joachim Kuhs +1 · ID

    Added: 14 c. Calls for the possibility of processing asylum applications in countries of origin and transit in order to avoid fuelling migration into the Union;

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 705

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
CyprusS&D
For
AustriaEPP
For
GermanyRenew
For
FranceRenew
For
AustriaS&D
For
CroatiaS&D
For
LuxembourgRenew
For
GermanyS&D
For
GermanyEPP
For
GermanyEPP
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en