EN
Deutsch
Français
ItalianoVote in the European Parliament
2022 discharge: General budget of the EU - EDF (9th, 10th and 11th)
Joachim Kuhs – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Date: 11.04.2024Reference: A9-0110/2024general budget (EU)European Development Fundauditbudgetary dischargefinancial yearfinancial controldevelopment aid
Overall Result
Adopted- 242 For
- 62 Against
- 294 Abstention
- 107 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (764 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2023/2183(DEC) · DEC
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Other activity
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (11)
- Referral to committee
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee report tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Other recorded activity
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Discharge granted for 9th to 11th EDF 2022.
- Error rate in expenditure audits rose to 7.1 % .
- Emphasis on climate change and food security in ACP states.
Amendment history (1)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
Paragraph 47 a (new)
Tabled by Joachim Kuhs, Matteo Adinolfi, Dominique Bilde · ID
Added: 47 a. Stresses that any funding under EDF should be made conditional on the effective implementation of return and readmission agreements;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For43
- 43For
- 26Against
- 85Abstention
- 31Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For146
- 146For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 31Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For22
- 22For
- 5Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For9
- 9For
- 0Against
- 109Abstention
- 21Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For20
- 20For
- 15Against
- 57Abstention
- 10Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For1
- 1For
- 1Against
- 9Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For1
- 1For
- 0Against
- 26Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Identity and Democracy (ID)For0
- 0For
- 15Against
- 8Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Poland | NI | For | |
 Sweden | EPP | For | |
 Spain | EPP | For | |
| Sweden | EPP | For | |
 Belgium | EPP | For | |
| Poland | NI | For | |
| Belgium | ECR | For | |
 Portugal | EPP | For | |
| Poland | NI | For | |
 Ireland | EPP | For |
