Vote in the European Parliament
2022 discharge: General budget of the EU - European Public Prosecutors Office (the ‘EPPO’)
Date: 11.04.2024Reference: A9-0117/2024Overall Result
Adopted- 494 For
- 90 Against
- 21 Abstention
- 100 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (765 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2023/2139(DEC) · DEC
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Other activity
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (13)
- Referral to committee
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Other recorded activity
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
Amendment history (2)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
Recital K a (new)
Tabled by Cristian Terheş, Ryszard Czarnecki · ECR
Added: K a. Whereas on 14 October 2022, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office announced that there is an ongoing investigation into the acquisition of COVID-19 vaccines in the Union and the fact that this exceptional confirmation comes after the extremely high public interest on the matter1a; 1a https://www.eppo.europa.eu/en/news/ongoing-eppo-investigation-acquisition-covid-19-vaccines-eu
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Tabled by Cristian Terheş, Ryszard Czarnecki · ECR
Added: 29 a. Highlights the critical necessity of promptly dedicating necessary resources to ensure the timely conclusion of the ongoing investigation into the acquisition of the COVID-19 vaccine in the Union, especially considering the substantial public interest in this matter, coupled with the fact that the investigation already commenced in 2022 and to this date no decision has been publicly announced;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 119For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 19Did not vote
- 146For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 31Did not vote
- 89For
- 55Against
- 11Abstention
- 30Did not vote
- 94For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 28For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 11For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 7For
- 20Against
- 1Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 0For
- 15Against
- 8Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |