EN
DeutschVote in the European Parliament
2022 discharge: General budget of the EU - Court of Justice of the European Union
Date: 11.04.2024Reference: A9-0075/2024Overall Result
Adopted- 525 For
- 69 Against
- 9 Abstention
- 102 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (764 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2023/2132(DEC) · DEC
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Other activity
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (11)
- Referral to committee
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Other recorded activity
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Parliament grants discharge for 2022 ECJ budget .
- Audit by Court of Auditors found error rate below materiality threshold .
- Emphasis on transparency, digitalisation and sustainability of ECJ.
Amendment history (1)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
Paragraph 36 a (new)
Tabled by Cristian Terheş, Ryszard Czarnecki · ECR
Added: 36 a. Reiterates the position of the Parliament, which commended for broadcasting the delivery of CJEU judgments and the reading of the Advocates General’s opinions live on its website, which allows citizens to follow hearings under the same conditions as if they were physically present; calls on the CJEU to also broadcast all hearings live; recalls that this request is also supported by the civil society, which asked that the hearings of the Court of Justice of the European Union be live streamed on its website, as it is already the practice of several national and international courts, like the European Court of Human Rights;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)- 108For
- 38Against
- 6Abstention
- 33Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)- 118For
- 3Against
- 1Abstention
- 17Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)- 94For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)- 19For
- 6Against
- 1Abstention
- 5Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)- 148For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 28Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)- 27For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)- 11For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Identity and Democracy (ID)- 0For
- 22Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Hungary | NI | For | |
 Spain | NI | For | |
| Spain | S&D | For | |
 Romania | NI | For | |
 France | S&D | For | |
 Italy | NI | For | |
 Croatia | S&D | For | |
 Czechia | Renew | For | |
| Hungary | S&D | For | |
 Poland | ECR | For |
