EN
EspañolVote in the European Parliament
2022 discharge: European Union Agency for Asylum (before 19.1.2022 the European Asylum Support Office)
Petri Sarvamaa – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Date: 11.04.2024Reference: A9-0106/2024auditbudgetary dischargeEuropean Union Agency for Asylumgeneral budget (EU)financial yearfinancial control
Overall Result
Adopted- 473 For
- 126 Against
- 2 Abstention
- 104 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (764 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2023/2164(DEC) · DEC
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Other activity
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (11)
- Referral to committee
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee report tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Other recorded activity
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Discharge of the EU Asylum Agency for 2022 budget execution.
- Budget execution rate of 96.23 % for commitments.
- Criticism of 15 % lapsed transferred funds.
Amendment history (1)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Tabled by Joachim Kuhs, Dominique Bilde, Matteo Adinolfi · ID
Added: 10 a. Calls for the possibility of processing asylum applications in countries of origin and transit in order to avoid fueling migration into the Union;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
European People's Party (EPP)For143
- 143For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 34Did not vote
Non-attached Members (NI)For84
- 84For
- 73Against
- 1Abstention
- 27Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For119
- 119For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 20Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For85
- 85For
- 6Against
- 0Abstention
- 11Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For3
- 3For
- 24Against
- 1Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For28
- 28For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For10
- 10For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Identity and Democracy (ID)For1
- 1For
- 22Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Lithuania | EPP | For | |
 Italy | NI | For | |
| Italy | S&D | For | |
 Ireland | EPP | For | |
 Bulgaria | Renew | For | |
 Germany | EPP | For | |
 Poland | EPP | For | |
| Poland | S&D | For | |
 France | Renew | For | |
 Belgium | EPP | For |
