Vote in the European Parliament

Amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure implementing the parliamentary reform “Parliament 2024”

Salvatore De Meo - Après le § 56 - Am 120
Date: 10.04.2024·Reference: A9-0158/2024
Rapporteur: Salvatore De Meo

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 155 For
  • 419 Against
  • 38 Abstention
  • 93 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 120 · Tabled by Verts/ALEView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Damian Boeselager

Added: Rule 56a Budgetary assessment on proposals for legally binding acts with budgetary implications 1. Without prejudice to the application of Rule 48, where a proposal for a legally binding act has implications for the Union budget, that proposal shall be referred by the President to the committee responsible for budgetary issues. That committee shall then issue a budgetary assessment of the proposal if it deems it appropriate or if so requested by the committee responsible for the subject-matter. This paragraph is without prejudice to the possibility for the committee responsible for budgetary issues to be authorised to submit opinions pursuant to Rule 56 or to act jointly with one or more committees pursuant to Rule 58. 2. The committee responsible for the subject-matter shall set a deadline within which the budgetary assessment is to be provided. Any changes to the announced timetable shall be immediately communicated to the committee responsible for budgetary issues. The committee responsible for the subject-matter shall not adopt its report before that deadline has expired. 3. In the budgetary assessment, the committee responsible for budgetary issues shall examine whether the proposal for a legally binding act provides for sufficient financial and human resources, and evaluate the potential impact of the financing proposed on other Union programmes or policies. It shall also determine whether the proposal is compatible with the multiannual financial framework, the system of own resources and the corresponding interinstitutional agreement, as well as the budgetary principles as laid down in the Financial Regulation. Where applicable, the committee responsible for budgetary issues shall also determine whether the proposal is compatible with Parliament’s position on any proposal to amend or replace that framework, that system, that agreement or those principles. 4. The budgetary assessment shall consist of an evaluation of the aspects of the proposal for a legally-binding act referred to in paragraph 3. The budgetary assessment may, where appropriate, also contain amendments to that proposal covering exclusively those aspects referred to in paragraph 3. Amendments on those aspects by the committee responsible for the subject-matter shall be inadmissible. The budgetary assessment, including the amendments, shall be integrated into the report as such. 5. Where a budgetary assessment is provided, the committee responsible for the subject-matter and the committee responsible for budgetary issues shall cooperate throughout the procedure to ensure full consistency between policy and budgetary objectives. To this end, they shall invite each other’s rapporteurs to their discussions within Parliament relating to the proposal for a legally binding act, including to the meetings between the rapporteurs and shadow rapporteurs. 6. Where a budgetary assessment is provided, the negotiating team referred to in Rule 74(1) shall include the rapporteur from the committee responsible for budgetary issues who shall lead the negotiations on the issues referred to in paragraph 3. Where a budgetary assessment is not provided, the committee responsible for the subject-matter may ask the committee responsible for budgetary issues to provide assistance to the negotiating team referred to in Rule 74(1) in relation to the aspects referred to in paragraph 3 at any stage of the interinstitutional negotiations.

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE760.542

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (963 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2024/2000(REG) · REG

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage3 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Referral44 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Committee stage5 days until the next step
  4. Latest recorded: Plenary963 days since this step began
Recorded activities (6)
  1. Committee report tabled
  2. Referral to committee
  3. Committee report adopted
  4. Tabling for plenary
  5. Plenary vote
  6. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 705

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
SwedenGreens/EFA
For
GermanyGreens/EFA
For
GermanyNI
For
GermanyRenew
For
PolandEPP
For
FranceGreens/EFA
For
FranceEPP
Intended voteAgainstSubmitted vote: For
BelgiumNI
For
LithuaniaEPP
For
GermanyGreens/EFA
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en