Vote in the European Parliament

Soil Monitoring and Resilience (Soil Monitoring Law)

Martin Hojsík – Article 22 – Am 233D
Date: 10.04.2024·Reference: A9-0138/2024
Rapporteur: Martin Hojsík

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 298 For
  • 307 Against
  • 8 Abstention
  • 92 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 233 · Draft legislative act · Tabled by MembersView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Herbert Dorfmann, Norbert Lins, Daniel Buda, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Franc Bogovič, Lena Düpont, Peter Jahr, Jarosław Kalinowski, Gabriel Mato, Marlene Mortler, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Anne Sander, Christine Schneider, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Michaela Šojdrová, Karolin Braunsberger-Reinhold, Niclas Herbst, Ralf Seekatz, Marion Walsmann, Carlos Coelho, Lídia Pereira, Leopoldo López Gil, Javier Zarzalejos, Christian Doleschal, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Dolors Montserrat, Markus Pieper, Michael Gahler, Ana Collado Jiménez, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Asim Ademov, Petri Sarvamaa, Henk Jan Ormel, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar, Markus Ferber, Francisco José Millán Mon, Monika Hohlmeier, Janusz Lewandowski, Laurence Sailliet, Tom Berendsen, Geoffroy Didier, François-Xavier Bellamy, Pablo Arias Echeverría

Removed: Article 22 Access to justice Member States shall ensure that members of the public, in accordance with national law, that have a sufficient interest or that maintain the impairment of a right, have access to a review procedure before a court of law, or an independent and impartial body established by law, to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of the assessment of soil health, the measures taken pursuant to this Directive and any failures to act of the competent authorities. Member States shall determine what constitutes a sufficient interest and impairment of a right, consistently with the objective of providing the public with wide access to justice. For the purposes of paragraph 1, any non-governmental organisation promoting environmental protection and meeting any requirements under national law shall be deemed to have rights capable of being impaired and their interest shall be deemed sufficient. Review procedures referred to in paragraph 1 shall be fair, equitable, timely and free of charge or not prohibitively expensive, and shall provide adequate and effective remedies, including injunctive relief where necessary. Member States shall ensure that practical information is made available to the public on access to the administrative and judicial review procedures referred to in this Article. Added: deleted

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE760.536

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (352 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2023/0232(COD) · COD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral8 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage148 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Plenary216 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Negotiations225 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Committee stage127 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Referral5 days until the next step
  7. Recorded: Committee stage6 days until the next step
  8. Recorded: Plenary3 days until the next step
  9. Recorded: Other activity20 days until the next step
  10. Recorded: Signature14 days until the next step
  11. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (25)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee amendments tabled
  5. Committee amendments tabled
  6. Committee amendments tabled
  7. Committee opinion adopted
  8. Committee report adopted
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Parliament’s first-reading position with amendments
  11. Plenary vote
  12. Plenary vote results
  13. Interinstitutional negotiations
  14. Interinstitutional negotiations
  15. Interinstitutional negotiations
  16. Provisional agreement approved in committee
  17. Referral to committee
  18. Committee report tabled
  19. Committee report adopted
  20. Tabling for plenary
  21. Other recorded activity
  22. Plenary vote
  23. Plenary vote results
  24. Signature
  25. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Soil Monitoring Law aims for healthy soils in the EU by 2050 .
  • Focus on monitoring, regeneration and sustainable soil management.
  • Funding via EU missions, CAP and cohesion funds planned.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 705

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
FinlandEPP
For
SloveniaEPP
For
RomaniaEPP
For
GermanyEPP
For
AustriaEPP
For
GermanyEPP
For
HungaryNI
For
FrancePfE
For
SpainNI
For
NetherlandsEPP
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en