Vote in the European Parliament
A9-0017/2024 – María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Samira Rafaela – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)
Date: 29.02.2024Reference: A9-0017/2024Overall Result
Adopted- 319 For
- 113 Against
- 121 Abstention
- 152 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Other activity · (988 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2023/0260(NLE) · NLE
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Latest recorded: Other activity
Recorded activities (9)
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee report tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Referral to committee
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Other recorded activity
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Modernization of EU-Chile agreement finalized for 2024.
- Strengthening trade and raw material partnership with Chile.
- Focus on sustainability, human rights and climate neutrality .
Amendment history (4)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 4Rejected
Recital G a (new)
Tabled by Marco Campomenosi, Thierry Mariani, Markus Buchheit +4 · ID
Added: Ga. whereas the EU has a consistent trade deficit with Chile in agri-food products, amounting to EUR 932 million in 2022;
- Amendment 5Rejected
Paragraph 34
Tabled by Marco Campomenosi, Thierry Mariani, Markus Buchheit +4 · ID
34.
Removed: Recognises the efforts made on protectingAdded: Expresses its deep concern about the significant additional market access granted for sensitive EU agricultural products such as meat (beef, poultry, pig and sheep … certain fruits and vegetables (e.g. garlic, apple juice, grape juice) and oliveRemoved: oil by imposing limited and controlled access for highly sensitive products using TRQs, and excludingAdded: oil; is worried, in this regard, about the impact such imports may have on domestic EU agricultural production and on EU farmers in general; appreciates the exclusion of sugar and bananas from any trade liberalisation, with the aim of protecting … - Amendment 6Rejected
Paragraph 34 a (new)
Tabled by Marco Campomenosi, Thierry Mariani, Markus Buchheit +4 · ID
Added: 34a. Is deeply worried that the Commission is negotiating free trade agreements that provide for high levels of imports of beef, poultry, pig and sheep meat without taking into consideration the cumulative impact of existing and future free trade agreements on EU farmers; calls on the Commission, in this regard, to immediately conduct a revised study on the cumulative impact of free trade agreements on EU farmers and to adopt proposals that foster local EU production and help EU farmers survive increasing global competition;
- Amendment 8Rejected
Paragraph 36 a (new)
Tabled by Marco Campomenosi, Thierry Mariani, Markus Buchheit +4 · ID
Added: 36a. Regrets that the agreement does not contain mirror clauses; highlights the need to ensure that imported products respect the same sanitary, phytosanitary, animal welfare and environmental standards imposed in the EU throughout the whole production process; underlines the importance of ensuring a very thorough control on goods entering the EU market in order to ensure that no phytosanitary products banned in the EU are used;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 124For
- 10Against
- 2Abstention
- 42Did not vote
- 87For
- 8Against
- 13Abstention
- 32Did not vote
- 82For
- 0Against
- 6Abstention
- 14Did not vote
- 22For
- 55Against
- 64Abstention
- 42Did not vote
- 3For
- 3Against
- 12Abstention
- 13Did not vote
- 1For
- 9Against
- 20Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 0For
- 17Against
- 4Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 0For
- 11Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |