Vote in the European Parliament

Report on the Commission’s 2023 Rule of Law report

Sophia in 't Veld – § 18 – Am 8
Date: 28.02.2024·Reference: A9-0025/2024
Rapporteur: Sophia in 't Veld

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 411 For
  • 96 Against
  • 25 Abstention
  • 173 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 8 · Tabled by MembersView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Jeroen Lenaers, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Henna Virkkunen, Tom Vandenkendelaere, Maria Spyraki, Aušra Seibutytė, Michaela Šojdrová, Jan Olbrycht, Janina Ochojska, Jarosław Duda, Krzysztof Brejza, Jarosław Kalinowski, Tomasz Frankowski, Sandra Kalniete, Dennis Radtke, Andrius Kubilius, Riho Terras, Siegfried Mureşan, Rasa Juknevičienė, Radan Kanev, Emil Radev, Asim Ademov, Alexander Alexandrov Yordanov, Andrey Novakov, Sabine Verheyen, Andrzej Halicki, Seán Kelly, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Christine Schneider, Vladimír Bilčík, Martine Kemp, Petri Sarvamaa, Hildegard Bentele, Peter Liese, Wolfram Pirchner, Sirpa Pietikäinen, José Manuel Fernandes, Tom Berendsen, Pilar del Castillo Vera, David McAllister, Andrey Kovatchev, Antonius Manders, Andreas Schwab, Franc Bogovič, Ljudmila Novak, Milan Zver, Herbert Dorfmann, Lena Düpont, Danuta Maria Hübner, Željana Zovko, Angelika Niebler, Norbert Lins, Manolis Kefalogiannis, Stelios Kympouropoulos, Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou, Tomas Tobé, Paulo Rangel, Sara Skyttedal, David Lega, Janusz Lewandowski, Karolin Braunsberger-Reinhold, Vasile Blaga, Jörgen Warborn, Arba Kokalari, Daniel Caspary, Christian Doleschal, Monika Hohlmeier, Rainer Wieland, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Vangelis Meimarakis, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Markus Ferber, Dolors Montserrat, Magdalena Adamowicz, Gabriel Mato, Anja Haga, Javier Zarzalejos, Tomáš Zdechovský, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Karlo Ressler, Sunčana Glavak, Eleni Stavrou, Theodoros Zagorakis, Pernille Weiss

… Member States that have not yet done so to join the EPPO; Added: welcomes that fact that Poland has initiated the procedure to join the EPPO, which demonstrates the new government’s strong commitment to protecting the EU’s financial interests and to effectively fighting against corruption; considers that membership of the EPPO should be a precondition for receiving …

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE756.905

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (1016 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2023/2113(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral93 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage111 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary1016 days since this step began
Recorded activities (9)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee opinion tabled
  3. Committee report tabled
  4. Committee opinion adopted
  5. Committee report adopted
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Plenary debate
  8. Plenary vote
  9. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Analysis of the 2023 Rule of Law Report by EU Parliament.
  • Demand for stronger protection mechanisms for judiciary and fundamental rights.
  • Criticism of systemic deficiencies in several member states.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 705

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
PortugalS&D
For
SlovakiaNI
For
RomaniaEPP
For
ItalyEPP
For
HungaryNI
For
GermanyNI
For
FinlandEPP
For
GermanyEPP
For
RomaniaS&D
For
BulgariaRenew
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en