ENVote in the European Parliament
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on standard essential patents and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1001
Marion Walsmann – Commission proposal
Date: 28.02.2024Reference: A9-0016/2024European Patent Officeregistered trade markpatent lawpatents licencecodification of EU lawEU trade markEuropean patentdata processingdigital transformationintellectual propertysmall and medium-sized enterprisescompetitivenesstrade-mark lawinnovation
Overall Result
Adopted- 454 For
- 83 Against
- 78 Abstention
- 90 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (1018 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2023/0133(COD) · COD
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (12)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Parliament’s first-reading position with amendments
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- SEP Regulation aims to make licensing more transparent and efficient.
- FRAND terms as key benchmark for patent licenses.
- EUIPO to establish new competence center for register and dispute resolution.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Renew Europe (Renew)For52
- 52For
- 20Against
- 24Abstention
- 6Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For105
- 105For
- 32Against
- 17Abstention
- 24Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For118
- 118For
- 8Against
- 0Abstention
- 14Did not vote
Non-attached Members (NI)For118
- 118For
- 18Against
- 15Abstention
- 32Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For9
- 9For
- 0Against
- 2Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For30
- 30For
- 0Against
- 2Abstention
- 1Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For12
- 12For
- 4Against
- 10Abstention
- 5Did not vote
Identity and Democracy (ID)For10
- 10For
- 1Against
- 8Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Bulgaria | Renew | For | |
 Spain | EPP | For | |
 France | S&D | For | |
 Germany | EPP | For | |
 Ireland | NI | For | |
 Romania | EPP | For | |
| France | S&D | For | |
 Latvia | NI | For | |
| Ireland | NI | For | |
 Italy | NI | For |
