Vote in the European Parliament
European Central Bank – annual report 2023
Date: 27.02.2024Reference: A9-0412/2023Overall Result
Adopted- 418 For
- 157 Against
- 42 Abstention
- 88 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (1068 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2023/2064(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (7)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
Amendment history (9)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Adopted
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Tabled by Sven Simon · PPE
Added: 24a. Expresses grave concern at recent media reports of political bias within the ECB regarding the so-called greening of policies; recalls that an undeterred focus on the ECB’s mandate of price stability is of paramount importance for the integrity and public support of the institution; notes the importance of pluralism for the institutional culture of the ECB; calls on the ECB to investigate and swiftly address any suspicions of ideological bias;
- Amendment 6Rejected
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Tabled by Manon Aubry · The Left
Added: 5a. Calls on the ECB to convert its government debt holdings into zero-rate perpetual debt;
- Amendment 7Rejected
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Tabled by Bas Eickhout · Verts/ALE
Added: 22a. Notes that a successful green transition can help alleviate future inflationary pressures by reducing physical risk and the dependence on fossil fuels; is concerned, in this regard, that high interest rates disproportionately affect green investments owing to higher up front capital costs; notes that national central banks in the Eurosystem have, in the past, implemented differentiated interest rates, for example, to benefit export credits; encourages the ECB to consider the introduction of differentiated interest rates; notes recent endorsements of that approach from civil society, academia and the French President;
- Amendment 11Adopted
Recital B b (new)
Tabled by Sandra Pereira, João Pimenta Lopes · The Left
Added: Bb. whereas the 10 consecutive increases in reference interest rates are having particularly damaging effects on the solvency of households and microenterprises and SMEs in countries which predominantly use variable interest rate models;
- Amendment 13Rejected
Recital C b (new)
Tabled by João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left
Added: Cb. whereas the increase in reference interest rates is leading to greater financial margins in the banking sector, depending on levels of concentration in it;
- Amendment 14Rejected
Paragraph -1 (new)
Tabled by João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left
Added: 1. Considers it imperative for the European Central Bank to reverse its increases to reference interest rates;
- Amendment 15Rejected
Paragraph -1 a (new)
Tabled by João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left
Added: 1a. Takes the view that, in the immediate future, it should be the banking sector’s profits that absorb the rise in reference interest rates on mortgages;
- Amendment 16Rejected
Paragraph -1 b (new)
Tabled by João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left
Added: 1b. Takes the view that combating inflation should not entail squeezing demand or family incomes, but rather increasing salaries and pensions; regulating the prices of essential goods and services; fighting speculation; taxing the profits of large economic groups and using the proceeds to promote development and social progress; boosting national output of both consumer goods and production assets, including in the energy sector, making the most of renewable energies to guarantee greater energy sovereignty and stability in supply chains; promoting peace, political solutions of conflicts and the sovereign development of states;
- Amendment 17Rejected
Paragraph -1 c (new)
Tabled by João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left
Added: 1c. Takes the view that the current socio-economic situation, an inevitable corollary of the ECB’s deciding to make 10 consecutive interest rate rises, shows that the euro deprives states of the monetary, financial, exchange-rate and, to a large extent, budgetary policy instruments with which to promote a form of development that takes account of their specific national realities and the necessary policy responses to the social and economic problems that have arisen;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 145For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 32Did not vote
- 91For
- 3Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 121For
- 2Against
- 1Abstention
- 16Did not vote
- 17For
- 4Against
- 9Abstention
- 1Did not vote
- 43For
- 89Against
- 24Abstention
- 27Did not vote
- 1For
- 31Against
- 1Abstention
- 0Did not vote
- 0For
- 17Against
- 5Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 0For
- 11Against
- 1Abstention
- 1Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |