EN

Vote in the European Parliament

Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed, and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/625

Jessica Polfjärd - Après le considérant 24 - Am 238
Date: 07.02.2024·Reference: A9-0014/2024
Rapporteur: Jessica Polfjärd
genetically modified organismanimal feedingstuffscultivation techniquesmarket approvalfood productionplant breedingfood inspectionplant health legislationpublic healthlabelling

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 289 For
  • 295 Against
  • 37 Abstention
  • 84 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 238 · Draft legislative act · Tabled by Verts/ALEView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Martin Häusling

Added: (24 a) Organic and conventional operators should have the right and freedom not to use NGTs in their production process and throughout their supply chain. This Regulation shall lay out adequate provisions to ensure the freedom of choice for operators not to use NGT plants and seeds, both category 1 and 2, in their production processes. Any additional financial and legal burden to ensure the GMO and NGT-free status of production should not fall on farmers and operators who do not wish to use NGTs. Economic losses incurred due to the adventitious presence of GMOs shall not fall on NGT-free conventional and organic operators. In most cases of adventitious presence, it is impossible to establish the causes, faults, and therefore responsibilities. Thus, this Regulation shall establish coexistence measures, laying the basis for national liability provisions and compensation funds.

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE756.833

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (140 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2023/0226(COD) · COD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral6 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage96 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Plenary9 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Negotiations77 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Plenary377 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Negotiations267 days until the next step
  7. Recorded: Committee stage92 days until the next step
  8. Recorded: Referral22 days until the next step
  9. Recorded: Committee stage24 days until the next step
  10. Recorded: Plenary2 days until the next step
  11. Recorded: SignatureNext step on the same day
  12. Recorded: Other activity9 days until the next step
  13. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (32)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee amendments tabled
  5. Committee amendments tabled
  6. Committee amendments tabled
  7. Committee opinion adopted
  8. Committee report adopted
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Plenary debate
  11. Text amended in plenary
  12. Referred back to committee for interinstitutional negotiations
  13. Plenary vote
  14. Plenary vote results
  15. Parliament’s first-reading position
  16. Plenary vote
  17. Plenary vote results
  18. Interinstitutional negotiations
  19. Interinstitutional negotiations
  20. Interinstitutional negotiations
  21. Interinstitutional negotiations
  22. Provisional agreement approved in committee
  23. Referral to committee
  24. Committee amendments tabled
  25. Committee report tabled
  26. Committee report adopted
  27. Tabling for plenary
  28. Other recorded activity
  29. Signature
  30. Plenary vote
  31. Plenary vote results
  32. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote
  3. Plenary vote
  4. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Roll-call minutesParliament documentProcedure file (OEIL)

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Regulation of new genomic techniques for plants and food products.
  • Goals: Enhance sustainability, Green Deal and food security.
  • Category 1 plants treated as conventional breeding.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Non-attached Members (NI)
For111
  • 111For
  • 25Against
  • 20Abstention
  • 28Did not vote
View details
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
For93
  • 93For
  • 32Against
  • 3Abstention
  • 13Did not vote
View details
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)
For30
  • 30For
  • 2Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 1Did not vote
View details
European People's Party (EPP)
For14
  • 14For
  • 132Against
  • 6Abstention
  • 25Did not vote
View details
Renew Europe (Renew)
For9
  • 9For
  • 83Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 9Did not vote
View details
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)
For12
  • 12For
  • 0Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 1Did not vote
View details
Identity and Democracy (ID)
For9
  • 9For
  • 6Against
  • 6Abstention
  • 4Did not vote
View details
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
For11
  • 11For
  • 15Against
  • 2Abstention
  • 3Did not vote
View details

Members

Showing 10 of 705

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
Andrea BocskorAndrea Bocskor
HungaryNI
For
Thijs ReutenThijs Reuten
NetherlandsS&D
For
Kira Marie Peter-HansenKira Marie Peter-Hansen
DenmarkGreens/EFA
For
Elżbieta KrukElżbieta Kruk
PolandNI
For
Ladislav IlčićLadislav Ilčić
CroatiaNI
For
Emmanuel MaurelEmmanuel Maurel
FranceNI
For
Udo BullmannUdo Bullmann
GermanyS&D
For
Daniel FreundDaniel Freund
GermanyGreens/EFA
For
Eva KailiEva Kaili
GreeceNI
For
Predrag Fred MatićPredrag Fred Matić
CroatiaS&D
For
Show more
← Go back
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en