Vote in the European Parliament
The state of play in the implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy and future perspectives
Date: 18.01.2024Reference: A9-0357/2023Overall Result
Adopted- 371 For
- 92 Against
- 92 Abstention
- 150 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (1096 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2021/2169(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (7)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
Amendment history (3)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Adopted
Paragraph 89 a (new)
Tabled by Ladislav Ilčić, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Bert-Jan Ruissen +41 · Members
Added: 89a. Stresses the need for an amendment to Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 concerning management measures for the sustainable exploitation of fishery resources in the Mediterranean Sea, also known as the ‘Mediterranean Regulation’, which lays down rules on the technical characteristics of fishing gears and their uses and which is unfortunately outdated and as such presents an obstacle to fulfilling the main goals of the Common Fisheries Policy, particularly those related to small-scale fisheries;
- Amendment 2Adopted
Paragraph 82
Tabled by Ska Keller, Saskia Bricmont, Petras Auštrevičius +72 · Members
… on the Commission to further increase science-based knowledge on the welfare of
Removed: farmedaquatic animals and to take this research into consideration in future policy developments in Added: fisheries and aquaculture; stresses that, any future policy developments should also take practical feasibility into account in Added: fisheries and aquaculture management andRemoved: should not addAdded: the potential economic and operationalRemoved: burden toAdded: impact on operators’ and activities, and should also consider the need to ensure an … - Amendment 5Rejected
Paragraph 31
Tabled by Ska Keller · Verts/ALE
… and long-term certainty for fishers and in line with the MSY principle;
Removed: calls on the Commission and the Council to seek the best available scientific advice on the possibility of removing the TACs for certain stocks, while ensuring that the stock concerned remains within safe biological limits in the short and medium term;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 83For
- 4Against
- 0Abstention
- 14Did not vote
- 12For
- 0Against
- 10Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 129For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 49Did not vote
- 44For
- 48Against
- 58Abstention
- 34Did not vote
- 100For
- 7Against
- 1Abstention
- 33Did not vote
- 1For
- 2Against
- 18Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 2For
- 25Against
- 1Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 0For
- 6Against
- 3Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |