Vote in the European Parliament

Transparency and accountability of non-governmental organisations funded from the EU budget

Markus Pieper - Après le § 24 - Am 2
Date: 17.01.2024·Reference: A9-0446/2023
Rapporteur: Markus Pieper

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 299 For
  • 310 Against
  • 10 Abstention
  • 86 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 2 · Tabled by MembersView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Markus Pieper, Monika Hohlmeier, Jan Olbrycht, Eleni Stavrou, Niclas Herbst, Andrey Novakov, Daniel Buda, Franc Bogovič, Angelika Winzig, Lukas Mandl, Hildegard Bentele, Christian Doleschal, Lena Düpont, Christine Schneider, Markus Ferber, Sabine Verheyen, Michael Gahler, Angelika Niebler, Daniel Caspary, Andreas Schwab, Peter Jahr, Christian Ehler, Sven Simon, Norbert Lins, Peter Liese, Axel Voss, Jens Gieseke, Wolfram Pirchner, Christian Sagartz, Siegfried Mureşan, Petri Sarvamaa, Arnaud Danjean, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu, Herbert Dorfmann, Alexander Alexandrov Yordanov, Andrius Kubilius, Asim Ademov, Romana Tomc, Ljudmila Novak, Karlo Ressler, Milan Zver, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Iuliu Winkler, Loránt Vincze, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Ivan Štefanec, Anne Sander, Salvatore De Meo, Michaela Šojdrová, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, François-Xavier Bellamy, Cristian-Silviu Buşoi, Rainer Wieland, Gabriel Mato, Seán Kelly, Tomas Tobé, Laurence Sailliet, Marlene Mortler, Ralf Seekatz, Karolin Braunsberger-Reinhold, Marion Walsmann, Tomáš Zdechovský, Sara Skyttedal, Barbara Thaler, Rasa Juknevičienė, Brice Hortefeux, Dolors Montserrat, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Ana Collado Jiménez, Pablo Arias Echeverría, Javier Zarzalejos, Pernille Weiss, Stefan Berger, Geoffroy Didier, David McAllister, Miriam Lexmann, Jörgen Warborn, Henna Virkkunen, Arba Kokalari

Added: 24a. Acknowledges that the Commission provides administrative and financial support for the establishment of information platforms (e.g. the EU Business and Biodiversity Platform for the Nature Restoration Law), but wonders whether, in some cases, the lack of monitoring of the reliability of the information disseminated could encourage one-sided partisan political influence, thus giving the impression that the executive branch is lobbying the legislative branch, which would constitute an improper use of taxpayers’ money, damaging the neutrality of scientific analysis, and may be perceived as a conflict of interest in the EU institutions;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE756.728

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (1058 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2023/2122(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral62 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage100 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary1058 days since this step began
Recorded activities (11)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee opinion tabled
  3. Committee opinion tabled
  4. Committee report tabled
  5. Committee opinion adopted
  6. Committee opinion adopted
  7. Committee report adopted
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Plenary debate
  10. Plenary vote
  11. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 705

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
PolandNI
For
PolandECR
For
GermanyRenew
For
PolandECR
For
IrelandEPP
For
GermanyPfE
For
BelgiumPfE
For
SlovakiaEPP
For
SwedenRenew
For
AustriaPfE
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en