Vote in the European Parliament

A9-0429/2023 - Paulo Rangel - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte)

Date: 17.01.2024·Reference: A9-0429/2023
Rapporteur: Paulo Rangel

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 453 For
  • 85 Against
  • 95 Abstention
  • 72 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (1068 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2023/2084(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral102 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage77 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary1068 days since this step began
Recorded activities (7)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee report adopted
  4. Tabling for plenary
  5. Plenary debate
  6. Plenary vote
  7. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

Amendment history (3)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 1Rejected

    Recital U

    Tabled by Gilles Lebreton, Gunnar Beck, Antonio Maria Rinaldi · ID

    U. whereas the implementation of a ‘red card’ procedure Removed: cannot Added: should be considered a suitable and constructive tool in respect of the goal …

  2. Amendment 2Rejected

    Paragraph 17

    Tabled by Gilles Lebreton, Gunnar Beck · ID

    … at least one third of national parliaments can request that the Commission Removed: or the European Parliament, once the latter has been granted a general direct right of initiative, submit proposals with the aim of positively influencing the European debate; suggests, in this regard, that the Commission Removed: or the European Parliament could enjoy the discretion either to take on board such proposals or … doing so; points out that such a procedure cannot consist of a Added: true right of initiative Removed: or the right to withdraw or amend legislation as this would subvert ‘the Union method’ and the distribution of competences …

  3. Amendment 3Rejected

    Paragraph 17 a (new)

    Tabled by Gilles Lebreton, Gunnar Beck, Antonio Maria Rinaldi · ID

    Added: 17a. Proposes the introduction of a ‘red card’ procedure to complement the ‘green card’ procedure, whereby if reasoned opinions on a draft legislative act’s non-compliance with the principle of subsidiarity represent at least the 55 % of all the votes allocated to the national Parliaments under Article 7(1) of Protocol No 2, the reasoned opinions should be seen as politically binding and the draft should be withdrawn or amended to accommodate the concerns expressed; notes that this procedure would respect the balance of competences between the national and European levels, acting as an effective tool for defending subsidiarity; underlines that such a procedure would not alter the existing legislative process but would serve as an essential check, ensuring that national perspectives are duly taken into account in the European legislative process, thereby strengthening democratic legitimacy within the Union;

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 705

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
FranceRenew
For
SwedenRenew
For
BulgariaS&D
For
IrelandEPP
For
LuxembourgGreens/EFA
For
LuxembourgRenew
For
SloveniaEPP
For
BelgiumRenew
For
DenmarkRenew
For
BelgiumNI
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en