Vote in the European Parliament

Banking Union – annual report 2023

Ivars Ijabs – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)
Date: 16.01.2024·Reference: A9-0431/2023
Rapporteur: Ivars Ijabs

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 372 For
  • 115 Against
  • 132 Abstention
  • 86 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (1067 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2023/2078(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral90 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage90 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary1067 days since this step began
Recorded activities (6)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee report adopted
  4. Tabling for plenary
  5. Plenary vote
  6. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Banking Union completion requires EDIS establishment.
  • ECB and SRB enhance banking sector crisis resilience.
  • Banks must consistently enforce sanctions against Russia.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Amendment history (4)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 1Rejected

    Recital H

    Tabled by Philippe Lamberts · Verts/ALE

    H. Removed: whereas the lack of cross-border consolidation of the EU banking sector is affecting its global competitiveness and consumer banking in some Member States is still dominated by a small number of banks; whereas the profitability gap between EU and US banks has widened during … return on equity is 5 points lower than that of US banks’4; Added: whereas institutions deemed ‘too big to fail’ continue to pose systemic risks to the European financial system because of their size, complexity and interconnectedness; 4 De Vito, L. et al., Understanding the profitability gap between euro …

  2. Amendment 2Rejected

    Paragraph 9

    Tabled by Philippe Lamberts · Verts/ALE

    9. Removed: Calls on the Commission to assess impediments to cross-border mergers as well as potential incentives for ring fencing; takes note that, according to a public statement by Andrea Enria, Chair of the ECB Supervisory Board, the banking sector is still, by and large, a collection of national banking sectors; notes that a more integrated EU banking sector could enhance banks’ ability to undertake strategic investments and foster the development of EU capital markets, while acknowledging that the diversity of banking business models in the euro area enhances the resilience of the financial system; notes Added: Notes the risks that ‘too big to fail’ institutions Removed: could entail, and notes that financial stability could be increased by a Added: entail, and calls for a structural reform of EU G-SIBs that addresses moral hazard risks Removed: highlights that cross-border consolidation without excessive concentration could increase the profitability of the EU banking sector, and potentially improve the current situation of reduced services offered and increased costs for citizens in many Member States; Added: and contributes to financial stability;

  3. Amendment 3Rejected

    Paragraph 12 a (new)

    Tabled by Philippe Lamberts · Verts/ALE

    Added: 12a. Recalls that fossil fuel asset values are set to collapse; recalls that the collapse of fossil fuel asset values could trigger a major financial crisis; calls for higher capital charges to be set for fossil fuel investments, including by applying a risk weight of 1 250 % to new fossil fuel exposures and ensuring that such investments are fully equity funded;

  4. Amendment 4Rejected

    Paragraph 25

    Tabled by Philippe Lamberts · Verts/ALE

    25. Removed: Welcomes Added: Notes the agreement reached at interinstitutional level to implement Basel III standards in the EU; Removed: underlines that the framework will deliver different levels of increase in prudential requirements depending on banks’ reliance on the use of internal models to calculate their risk-weights; highlights that the new rules have strengthened and better specified proportionality in banking supervision and will continue to increase financial stability in the EU; underlines the importance of a level playing field between jurisdictions; Added: calls for the co-legislators to reconsider the deviations from international prudential standards which they have introduced, given that new risks have emerged since the adoption of the Basel III framework; recalls that the specificities of EU banks were taken into account in the calibration of Basel capital requirements;

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 705

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
RomaniaRenew
For
SpainS&D
For
SpainEPP
For
GermanyEPP
For
LithuaniaEPP
For
FranceRenew
For
EstoniaS&D
For
BulgariaRenew
For
IrelandEPP
For
GreeceEPP
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en