Vote in the European Parliament
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom`s withdrawal from the European Union
Date: 15.03.2023Reference: A9-0042/2023revision of an agreementtrade agreement (EU)tariff quotaGATTUnited KingdomUnited Stateswithdrawal from the EUratification of an agreement
Overall Result
Adopted- 522 For
- 15 Against
- 43 Abstention
- 125 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
The Parliament recorded no outcome; this is derived from the vote count.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (1288 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2022/0231(NLE) · NLE
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Other activity
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (5)
- Referral to committee
- Other recorded activity
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Publication in the Official Journal
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Approval of EU-US customs agreement post-Brexit.
- Adjustment of tariff quotas for agriculture and industry.
- Consideration of trade flows from 2013–2015.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
For111
- 111For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 33Did not vote
For154
- 154For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 22Did not vote
For103
- 103For
- 11Against
- 25Abstention
- 45Did not vote
For88
- 88For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 13Did not vote
For27
- 27For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
For10
- 10For
- 0Against
- 9Abstention
- 5Did not vote
For29
- 29For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
For0
- 0For
- 4Against
- 9Abstention
- 0Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |