Abstimmung im Europäischen Parlament

Schutz von Minderjährigen im Internet

Christel Schaldemose - Vorschlag für eine Entschließung (gesamter Text)
Datum: 26.11.2025·Referenz: A10-0213/2025
Berichterstatter/in: Christel Schaldemose

Gesamtergebnis

Angenommen
  • 483 Dafür
  • 92 Dagegen
  • 86 Enthaltung
  • 58 Nicht abgestimmt
Status und Verfahren

Ergebnis laut Europäischem Parlament.

Abgestimmt am
Zuletzt dokumentierter Schritt
Plenum · (vor 374 Tagen)
Nächster geplanter Schritt
In der Quelle ist kein weiterer Schritt geplant.

Verfahrensverlauf

2025/2060(INI) · INI

Dokumentierte Verfahrensschritte. Daraus folgt nicht, dass ein Gesetz in Kraft getreten ist.

  1. Dokumentiert: Überweisung63 Tage bis zum nächsten Schritt
  2. Dokumentiert: Ausschussberatung173 Tage bis zum nächsten Schritt
  3. Zuletzt dokumentiert: Plenum374 Tage seit Beginn dieses Schritts
Dokumentierte Schritte (13)
  1. Überweisung an den Ausschuss
  2. Ausschussbericht eingereicht
  3. Stellungnahme im Ausschuss eingereicht
  4. Änderungsanträge im Ausschuss eingereicht
  5. Änderungsanträge im Ausschuss eingereicht
  6. Stellungnahme im Ausschuss angenommen
  7. Ausschussbericht angenommen
  8. Einreichung für das Plenum
  9. Einreichung für das Plenum
  10. Einreichung für das Plenum
  11. Plenardebatte
  12. Plenarabstimmung
  13. Ergebnisse der Plenarabstimmung
Geplante Schritte (keine Bestätigung der Durchführung)
  1. Plenardebatte
  2. Plenarabstimmung

Verfahrensakte (OEIL) · Daten des Europäischen Parlaments
Abgerufen:

Quellen

Daten: EP Open Data API

Worum geht es?

  • Tiefe Besorgnis über Online-Gefahren für Körper und Geist von Minderjährigen, von denen 25 % Smartphones auf „problematische“ Weise nutzen
  • Strengere Durchsetzung der EU-Vorschriften für den digitalen Bereich, Geldbußen und mögliche Verbote von Plattformen, die Regeln nicht einhalten
  • Verbot von suchtförderndem Design, auf Profiling beruhenden Empfehlungssystemen und Lootboxen in Spielen
Quelle: EP Press Room — 26. November 2025

Verlauf der Änderungsanträge (6)

Wortlaut wie vom EP veröffentlicht, auf Englisch.

  1. Änderungsantrag 1Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 1 a (new)

    Eingereicht von Virginie Joron, Vilis Krištopans, Nikola Bartůšek +77 · Members

    Hinzugefügt: 1a. Calls for the swift and effective implementation of the surveillance and sanction measures provided for in Regulation (EU) 2017/2394, Regulation (EU) 2019/10201a, Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, and Regulation (EU) 2023/9881b when online platforms offer or sell illegal, dangerous or non-compliant products, in order to ensure a high level of consumer protection, with particular attention to minors as a highly vulnerable group requiring reinforced safeguards, notably to combat child sexual abuse; considers that these measures remain insufficient and that actions such as the temporary or even permanent suspension of the website concerned should be easily and swiftly applicable at national level; ____________ 1a Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on market surveillance and compliance of products and amending Directive 2004/42/EC and Regulations (EC) No 765/2008 and (EU) No 305/2011 (OJ L 169, 25.6.2019, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/1020/oj). 1b Regulation (EU) 2023/988 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 on general product safety, amending Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive (EU) 2020/1828 of the European Parliament and the Council, and repealing Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 87/357/EEC (OJ L 135, 23.5.2023, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/988/oj).

  2. Änderungsantrag 3Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 28

    Eingereicht von Elisabeth Dieringer, Vilis Krištopans, Nikola Bartůšek +72 · Members

    28. Entfernt: Calls for the establishment of a harmonised European digital age limit of 16 as the default threshold under which Hinzugefügt: Recognises the diverse perspectives among Member States regarding appropriate age limits for access to online social media Entfernt: platforms should not be allowed unless parents or guardians have authorised their children otherwise; calls for the same age limit to apply to video-sharing platforms and AI companions that present risks to minors; calls, furthermore, for a harmonised European digital age limit of 13, under which no minor can access social media platforms; calls on the panel of experts commissioned by President von der Leyen to assess, as part of their mandate, the application of an age limit of 13 Hinzugefügt: platforms, for video-sharing services and AI companions; stresses that Entfernt: this would serve as a protective measure Hinzugefügt: establishing digital age limits remains within the remit of Member States; calls for any age limits to be determined in consultation with child development experts and psychologists; recognises that while a coordinated European approach regarding an age limit of 13 could be beneficial, Member States should retain the flexibility to set appropriate thresholds based on expert guidance and their own cultural, educational and parental approaches, with provisions allowing minors to access platforms with parental or guardian authorisation; stresses that such measures would serve to support parents in managing their children’s digital presence and ensuring age-appropriate …

  3. Änderungsantrag 4Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 17

    Eingereicht von Kosma Złotowski, Piotr Müller, Arkadiusz Mularczyk +76 · Members

    17. Entfernt: Welcomes Hinzugefügt: Notes the Commission’s risk-based approach taken in its guidelines for effective, proportionate and … to ensure a high level of privacy, safety and security for minors; Hinzugefügt: recognises, however, that decisions on concrete measures in this field fall primarily within the competence of the Member States; calls on the Commission to Entfernt: present, if necessary, appropriate legislative measures to provide legal certainty and ensure a harmonised Hinzugefügt: continue providing guidance and facilitating cooperation and, only if necessary and with full respect for Member States’ prerogatives, to take appropriate measures to support a coordinated approach for safe and reliable age assurance Entfernt: mechanisms, taking into account the Commission guidelines on the protection of Hinzugefügt: mechanisms; emphasises that any future action must avoid unnecessary harmonisation and fully respect Member States’ competences and the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, while supporting Member States in achieving a high level of protection for minors throughout the Entfernt: EU, and guaranteeing an equal level of protection of minors in the Union;

  4. Änderungsantrag 5Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 20

    Eingereicht von Kosma Złotowski, Piotr Müller, Arkadiusz Mularczyk +76 · Members

    … a silver bullet for protecting minors from the many risks they face Entfernt: online; emphasises that such tools cannot remove Hinzugefügt: online and are prone to cybersecurity attacks, privacy intrusions, leaks of data and sensitive personal information and are easy to circumvent; expresses concern that mandatory EU age verification requirements could undermine online anonymity, with a potentially chilling effect on free speech; emphasises further that parents play a central role in ensuring safe online behaviour, and that their role cannot be replaced by legal measures or state involvement; underlines that strengthening education and awareness for both parents and children remains the most effective long-term approach to fostering healthy and informed digital habits; recalls platforms’ accountability for ensuring their products are safe and appropriate for minors …

  5. Änderungsantrag 6Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 23

    Eingereicht von Kosma Złotowski, Piotr Müller, Arkadiusz Mularczyk +76 · Members

    … that have already developed digital tools for effective age verification and the Entfernt: Commission in order to develop a strong and effective age verification tool at EU level, ensuring full respect for the technical specifications derived from the eIDAS2 Regulation; Hinzugefügt: Commission, with a view to exchanging best practices and supporting voluntary interoperability, while stressing that the introduction and enforcement of age-verification systems fall exclusively within the competence of the Member States, particularly as such systems require societal acceptance and must reflect public discourse as well as the diverse positions of parents across the Member States;

  6. Änderungsantrag 7Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 24

    Eingereicht von Kosma Złotowski, Piotr Müller, Arkadiusz Mularczyk +76 · Members

    24. Entfernt: Welcomes Hinzugefügt: Notes the Commission’s efforts to provide an EU-wide solution by developing an age-verification … proof protocols, building on the principles of minimal exposure and data minimisation; Hinzugefügt: stresses that any EU-level initiatives in this area must remain voluntary, respect national prerogatives and avoid the creation of a mandatory or centralised EU-wide tool; calls on the Commission to ensure that age assurance mechanisms that are … in particular minors, nor on the deployment of other unethical technological practices; Hinzugefügt: recalls that Member States retain full flexibility to determine their own approaches while safeguarding fundamental rights, parental roles and national competence;

Abstimmung nach Fraktion

So haben die Fraktionen abgestimmt

Mitglieder

Anzeige 10 von 719

Stimmverhalten
NameLandFraktionStimmverhalten
MaltaS&D
Dafür
FrankreichPfE
Dafür
FrankreichRenew
Dafür
NiederlandeEPP
Dafür
UngarnS&D
Dafür
UngarnPfE
Dafür
DeutschlandS&D
Dafür
ItalienS&D
Dafür
DeutschlandEPP
Dafür
FrankreichPfE
Dafür
Mehr anzeigen
Folge uns auf Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en