Abstimmung im Europäischen Parlament

Änderung der Verordnung (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093 zur Festlegung des mehrjährigen Finanzrahmens für den Zeitraum von 2021 bis 2027

Jan Olbrycht, Margarida Marques - Entschließungsantrag (gesamter Text)
Datum: 27.02.2024·Referenz: A9-0053/2024
Berichterstatter/in: Margarida Marques, Jan Olbrycht

Gesamtergebnis

Angenommen
  • 422 Dafür
  • 101 Dagegen
  • 101 Enthaltung
  • 81 Nicht abgestimmt
Status und Verfahren

Ergebnis laut Europäischem Parlament.

Abgestimmt am
Zuletzt dokumentierter Schritt
Amtsblatt · (vor 988 Tagen)
Nächster geplanter Schritt
In der Quelle ist kein weiterer Schritt geplant.
Veröffentlichung im Amtsblatt dokumentiert

Verfahrensverlauf

2023/0201(APP) · APP

Dokumentierte Verfahrensschritte. Daraus folgt nicht, dass ein Gesetz in Kraft getreten ist.

  1. Dokumentiert: Ausschussberatung10 Tage bis zum nächsten Schritt
  2. Dokumentiert: Plenum4 Tage bis zum nächsten Schritt
  3. Dokumentiert: Überweisung1 Tag bis zum nächsten Schritt
  4. Dokumentiert: PlenumNächster Schritt am selben Tag
  5. Dokumentiert: Weitere Schritte2 Tage bis zum nächsten Schritt
  6. Zuletzt dokumentiert: Amtsblatt
Dokumentierte Schritte (10)
  1. Ausschussbericht eingereicht
  2. Ausschussbericht eingereicht
  3. Ausschussbericht angenommen
  4. Einreichung für das Plenum
  5. Überweisung an den Ausschuss
  6. Weiterer dokumentierter Schritt
  7. Plenardebatte
  8. Plenarabstimmung
  9. Ergebnisse der Plenarabstimmung
  10. Veröffentlichung im Amtsblatt
Geplante Schritte (keine Bestätigung der Durchführung)
  1. Plenardebatte
  2. Plenarabstimmung

Verfahrensakte (OEIL) · Daten des Europäischen Parlaments
Abgerufen:

Quellen

Daten: EP Open Data API

Worum geht es?

  • Zustimmung zur Überarbeitung des MFR 2021–2027.
  • Finanzierungspaket für die Ukraine in Höhe von 50 Mrd. EUR .
  • Kritik an Kürzungen bei Horizont Europa und EU4Health.
Quelle: KI-Zusammenfassung mit Mistral

Verlauf der Änderungsanträge (22)

Wortlaut wie vom EP veröffentlicht, auf Englisch.

  1. Änderungsantrag 1Abgelehnt

    Paragraph -1 (new)

    Eingereicht von João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left

    Hinzugefügt: -1. Deplores the fact that this review is determined not by the need to address the real problems of each country and their peoples, but by the insistence on increasing militarisation, on financing and prolonging the war and confrontation and on rejecting the opening of negotiations aimed at achieving peace;

  2. Änderungsantrag 2Abgelehnt

    Paragraph -1 a (new)

    Eingereicht von João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left

    Hinzugefügt: -1a. Considers, on the contrary, that the mid-term review of the MFF should primarily serve to restore and strengthen the funds that have been cut, in relation to the previous MFF, in key areas such as cohesion policy;

  3. Änderungsantrag 3Abgelehnt

    Paragraph -1 b (new)

    Eingereicht von João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left

    Hinzugefügt: -1b. Considers that what is needed is for the EU budget to contribute to meeting the needs of workers and peoples, in particular by: supporting productive sectors, in particular in countries with persistent production deficits; improving public services; increasing public investment; supporting the conservation of nature, including the fight against climate change and the sustainable use of natural resources; reducing inequalities and development imbalances between countries; promoting peace, cooperation and solidarity between peoples.

  4. Änderungsantrag 4Abgelehnt

    Paragraph -1 c (new)

    Eingereicht von João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left

    Hinzugefügt: -1c. Deplores the fact that, in order to address the impact of the ECB’s decision to increase interest rates on the payment of the debt incurred to create the Recovery and Resilience Facility, a ‘cascade mechanism’ providing for the reallocation of funds from future budgets, initially planned for other areas, has been agreed for the payment of interest on the debt incurred;

  5. Änderungsantrag 5Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 2

    Eingereicht von Dimitrios Papadimoulis · The Left

    … an amending budget and for the remaining years of the MFF period; Entfernt: underlines Hinzugefügt: acknowledges that the MFF revision represents Entfernt: a clear Hinzugefügt: an improvement on the status Entfernt: quo, although some Hinzugefügt: quo; underlines, however, that many aspects contained in the draft Council regulation are manifestly not Entfernt: optimal, Hinzugefügt: optimal and fall significantly short of Parliament’s position and of the Commission’s proposal, leaving the EU budget under pressure, with limited margins and flexibility, with …

  6. Änderungsantrag 6Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 3 a (new)

    Eingereicht von Marc Botenga · The Left

    Hinzugefügt: 3a. Regrets that the revision of the MFF ignores the needs of the working classes and the unprecedented social crisis while dedicating more money to military expenditure;

  7. Änderungsantrag 7Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 3

    Eingereicht von Dimitrios Papadimoulis · The Left

    3. Recalls that Parliament argued that the Hinzugefügt: targeted revision should focus primarily on addressing the consequences of Russia’s war of … the Commission’s June 2023 proposal for a revision and are all present, Entfernt: at least to some Hinzugefügt: although to a much lesser extent, in the draft Council regulation to which Parliament is asked to give consent; Hinzugefügt: recalls that Parliament improved the Commission’s proposal and called for an additional EUR 10 billion, while the draft Council regulation represents a significant decrease compared to the proposal;

  8. Änderungsantrag 8Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 20

    Eingereicht von Dimitrios Papadimoulis · The Left

    … borrowing costs to be placed over and above the MFF ceilings as Entfernt: a Hinzugefügt: the only comprehensive structural solution to Hinzugefügt: fully protect the EU budget and its flexibility and cover NGEU repayment costs, which have increased as a result of rising …

  9. Änderungsantrag 9Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 32 a (new)

    Eingereicht von Manon Aubry, Younous Omarjee · The Left

    Hinzugefügt: 32a. Stresses that the Commission needs to take further timely action to increase the EU’s own resources; underlines that, in line with the IIA, which is legally binding, the Commission should present a genuine tax on financial transactions, which could raise more than EUR 50 billion per year, based on the details of the financial transaction tax that should have been implemented under enhanced cooperation according to the 2013 agreement;

  10. Änderungsantrag 10Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 32 b (new)

    Eingereicht von Manon Aubry, Younous Omarjee, Marc Botenga · The Left

    Hinzugefügt: 32b. Recalls that more than a third of Europeans regularly restrict how much food they eat; recalls that the wealth of the top 0.5 % of wealthiest individuals has increased by 35 % over the last 10 years; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to implement a European wealth tax, which could raise more than EUR 200 billion for the EU’s own resources;

  11. Änderungsantrag 11Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 32 c (new)

    Eingereicht von Manon Aubry, Younous Omarjee, Marc Botenga · The Left

    Hinzugefügt: 32c. Underlines that both the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank acknowledge that more than half of current price inflation is driven by companies increasing their profit margins; calls on the Commission, therefore, to make a new proposal for an own resource based on the permanent taxation of the windfall profits of multinational enterprises in all sectors, particularly the agri-food sector;

  12. Änderungsantrag 12Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 37

    Eingereicht von Dimitrios Papadimoulis · The Left

    37. Entfernt: Remains concerned Hinzugefügt: Regrets that, even after the revision, total commitment appropriations amount to only 1.02 …

  13. Änderungsantrag 13Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 38

    Eingereicht von Dimitrios Papadimoulis · The Left

    38. Entfernt: Deplores Hinzugefügt: Deeply deplores the cuts to flagship programmes in the MFF revision, especially to those … agreement, and is particularly concerned by the political signal these cuts send; Hinzugefügt: calls, therefore, for these cuts to be entirely reversed as a matter of urgency;

  14. Änderungsantrag 14Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 3 a (new)

    Eingereicht von Joachim Kuhs, Valentino Grant, Eric Minardi +1 · ID

    Hinzugefügt: 3a. Highlights the need to streamline administrative procedures, rationalise expenditure and enhance transparency and accountability in EU spending in order to ensure efficient and accountable use of taxpayers’ money for funding priorities and challenges;

  15. Änderungsantrag 15Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 14

    Eingereicht von Joachim Kuhs, Valentino Grant, Eric Minardi +1 · ID

    … programmes within Heading 6, which ensure robust oversight and guarantee Parliament’s prerogatives; Hinzugefügt: highlights the fact that that any development or humanitarian aid to third countries must be provided on condition that there is smooth cooperation in the repatriation of their citizens illegally residing in the European Union; stresses that the use of Facilities is a last resort for the …

  16. Änderungsantrag 16Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 34

    Eingereicht von Joachim Kuhs, Valentino Grant, Eric Minardi +1 · ID

    … Margin Instrument, which would have eliminated any risk of a payments crisis; Hinzugefügt: recalls that an increase of payment appropriations ceilings does not automatically correlate with better absorption capacity of the EU budget; points out, in this regard, that the amount of outstanding commitments (amounts committed but not yet paid) attained a record EUR 490 billion at the beginning of 2024;

  17. Änderungsantrag 18Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 19

    Eingereicht von Fabienne Keller · Renew

    … shortfall is currently estimated at EUR 15 billion between 2025 and 2027; Entfernt: underlines Hinzugefügt: stresses that, without a revision of the MFF, any shortfall can only be met by cutting programmes and exhausting budgetary flexibility; Hinzugefügt: is concerned, however, that the new mechanism to pay the NGEU interest payments will exhaust most of the available flexibilities and margins and will jeopardise the budget’s response capacity; insists on the need to safeguard sufficient margins and flexibility in each annual procedure to ensure that the EU can respond to unforeseen events;

  18. Änderungsantrag 20Angenommen

    Paragraph 39

    Eingereicht von Fabienne Keller · Renew

    … of investing 3 % of Gross Domestic Product in research and development; Hinzugefügt: insists that greater investment in European research and innovation (R&I) today is a prerequisite for Europe to secure its economic competitiveness tomorrow; notes that stepping up investment in R&I is necessary for Europe to retain or develop its technological leadership in sectors most impacted by the green and digital transitions; points out that cuts to European R&I activities are contrary to the promises made by EU leaders to boost the EU’s competitiveness and strengthen its open strategic autonomy; point outs, however, that Parliament helped mitigate the impact of the cut …

  19. Änderungsantrag 22Angenommen

    Paragraph 2

    Eingereicht von Rasmus Andresen · Verts/ALE

    … support to be provided to Ukraine and ensure reinforcements can be introduced Entfernt: already Hinzugefügt: as soon as possible into the 2024 budget through an amending budget and for the remaining … quo, although some aspects contained in the draft Council regulation are manifestly Entfernt: not optimal, Hinzugefügt: regrettable, leaving the EU budget under pressure, with limited margins and flexibility, with cuts to key programmes Hinzugefügt: such as Horizon Europe, EU4Health, as well as the cohesion policy and the common agricultural policy, and with reduced ambition in important future-oriented policy areas, such as sovereignty;

  20. Änderungsantrag 24Abgelehnt

    Title after Paragraph 35

    Eingereicht von Rasmus Andresen · Verts/ALE

    Entfernt: Impact Hinzugefügt: Negative impact on the EU budget

  21. Änderungsantrag 26Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 40

    Eingereicht von Rasmus Andresen · Verts/ALE

    … the clear political commitment in the 2020 MFF agreement to prioritise health Entfernt: funding; Hinzugefügt: funding in light of the COVID-19 pandemic; is, therefore, very disappointed by the cut of EUR 1 billion to Entfernt: EU4Health; Hinzugefügt: EU4Health which represents more than a third of the programme’s funds for 2025-2027; considers that such a decision Entfernt: is likely to Hinzugefügt: will undermine preparedness for any further pandemic Hinzugefügt: and health crisis and curtail the Union’s ability to support public health Entfernt: systems; Hinzugefügt: systems that are already suffering from cuts; points out, however, that, at Parliament’s request, the spending profile of the …

  22. Änderungsantrag 27Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 2 a (new)

    Eingereicht von Rasmus Andresen, Bas Eickhout, Philippe Lamberts · Verts/ALE

    Hinzugefügt: 2a. Recalls that significant additional investment is needed to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 at the latest; insists that extra public investment is crucial and urgent while the window of opportunity is still open for reaching our climate and energy targets with a view to a just transition; regrets that the revision of the MFF together with the ongoing revision of the fiscal rules do not address the funding gap; insists that these resources urgently need to be found or made available either in national public spending or mutualised at EU level to underpin the energy transition and a green industrial plan, which is a matter of urgency especially as the price of inaction will be that our economies will be unable to sustain our societies as we know them today and the current macroeconomic governance framework risks leading to severe cuts in social spending;

Abstimmung nach Fraktion

So haben die Fraktionen abgestimmt

Mitglieder

Anzeige 10 von 705

Stimmverhalten
NameLandFraktionStimmverhalten
SpanienGreens/EFA
Dafür
FrankreichEPP
Dafür
DeutschlandGreens/EFA
Dafür
SpanienS&D
Dafür
ItalienEPP
Dafür
SlowakeiRenew
Dafür
SpanienS&D
Dafür
PortugalEPP
Dafür
PolenS&D
Dafür
BulgarienEPP
Dafür
Mehr anzeigen
Folge uns auf Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en