What Petr spoke about.

19

May

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly (debate)

Mr President! Ladies and gentlemen, ladies and gentlemen! So this EU recommendation is a testament to the EU's dishonesty, denial of reality and, above all, its foreign policy incompetence. Falsehood: The document is full of the term ‘rule-based order’. Rule-based order here, rule-based order there. This can be found on each page several times. You completely forget that this rules-based order was destroyed by NATO – in 1999 by the bombing of Yugoslavia, in 2011 by the bombing of Libya. And it was precisely this EU that applauded and supported this at the time. Refusal of reality: These are the proposals for the reform of the Security Council. In your hatred of Russia, you try to restrict the veto and then completely abolish it, i.e. the veto right of the superpowers. So people in Beijing and Washington are laughing and clapping their thighs. Finally, the proposal to give the EU a seat on the Security Council alongside France – alongside France. So, dear friends, it's really going to be fun. Because the seat in the Security Council for France was already wrong in 1945. If the French think anything of the EU, they should offer their place to the EU. That would make sense.

19

May

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba (debate)

Madam President, It is an absolute disgrace what is happening here that a communist regime is to be supported here. And especially from the left-wing colleagues, i.e. this talk: America is to blame for everything, Donald Trump is to blame for everything. Finally, take note of this: Communism has failed everywhere. It didn't work in the Soviet Union, it didn't work in Africa, it didn't work in Europe, it doesn't work in Cuba, it doesn't work in South America, it doesn't work in Central America, it doesn't work anywhere. This is a completely misguided, bad, false ideology. That's why Cuba is broke. Just take note of this.

29

Apr

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment (debate)

29

Apr

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Topical debate requested by a political group (PfE) (Rule 169) - Commission interference in democratic process and elections (topical debate)

28

Apr

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 (debate)

Mr President! This whole report is totally worthless to the citizens, to our citizens. And I'll tell you why. Firstly: They are weeping here for violations of the fundamental rights of illegal migrants – one must imagine – of non-citizens of the EU who are illegally trying to invade our territory. That's crazy! Secondly: They mourn the alleged criminalisation of NGOs, the asylum industry and climate glue. What criminalization? That's good. Every normal citizen welcomes this when the climate adhesives that impede them on their way to work are first brought to the police. And everyone welcomes that when criminal smugglers and traffickers like Carola Rackete come to court. But no issue in your report is what the real problems are. We find nothing here about online censorship, about election manipulation, about the suppression of the opposition in the EU, in Germany. And my colleague Mary Khan has already mentioned this: You did not mention the injustice that happened to the citizens during the coronavirus era here either. This report belongs in the trash can!

11

Mar

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Building Europe's clean, independent and secure energy following the 2026 North Sea Summit (debate)

9

Mar

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (debate)

Mr Colleague, perhaps this is due to your party affiliation, that you regard as successful what the Commission is doing here and what this Parliament is clapping for. I do not think that it is successful to buy COVID-19 vaccines here, to keep the contracts with Pfizer secret and not even to inform Parliament afterwards. I don't know if you were in the Bundestag. I have been there for two legislative periods, and the debates are quite different if the opposition can table motions – legislative motions – there is a very different way of discussing the matter. So there's a lot more democracy, a lot more transparency. I'm sure we won't get together. You are right on one point: Many colleagues criticize this. I was very surprised that even a colleague from the Greens wanted to say in principle the same thing as I did, namely that we urgently, urgently need a right of initiative for the legislation.

9

Mar

2026

Answers DE

Watch

Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (debate)

Dear Mr Simon, thank you very much for this question. This was rhetorically clever, but completely wrong in the matter. Like me, you know – at least I hope – that we do not have a right of initiative on the laws. We can ask the Commission to make a contribution, but that is completely out of the question. We are the Parliament here, we represent the citizens – and not the Commission. And that should be changed. That's what I meant by what I said.

9

Mar

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (debate)

Madam President, Yes, ladies and gentlemen, if we are to be quite honest, we must admit that this so-called reform is actually just a fog candle. For years, the Commission has been doing what it wants, and we, the Parliament, are only the fencing guests who are supposed to give a democratic touch to all the hustle and bustle. This is best expressed by the behaviour here in Parliament: Commission representatives have five minutes of speaking time, and regularly spend another five minutes talking for ten minutes, i.e. more than ten elected MEPs with millions of votes behind them. And Ursula von der Leyen when we wanted to remove her? She brought her Claqueure in here. The staff of the Commission sat here in Parliament. There is nowhere in the world. At most, guests are allowed to sit in the grandstand and are not allowed to clap. We have no right of initiative, we cannot introduce laws, the rights of the opposition are castrated. The Commission negotiates important agreements in secret, and if we want to question them or criticise them, it is censored outside with the help of Soros ‑NGOs and OCCRP ‑Media. Reform is urgently needed. We really need to change that – with real reform and not just sham reform.

11

Feb

2026

Speeches PL

Watch

Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy (debate)

Well, here you go. The CDU has ruined Germany. Now join the socialists in these redistributive orgies – we from the AfD certainly do not.

11

Feb

2026

Speeches PL

Watch

Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy (debate)

I'll get to it at the end, but you took it from me. (inaudible words) Seconds out of 60.

11

Feb

2026

Speeches PL

Watch

Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy (debate)

This is a personal statement.

11

Feb

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy (debate)

Madam President, Just one representative of the CDU complained here that housing in Germany is expensive and that this is a reason for poverty in Germany. This is the CDU that caused this. It was a chancellor of the CDU who opened the borders barn-wide, let millions of migrants into Germany – a small lesson in a market economy: Increasing demand automatically leads to an increase in prices. And not just that. It was also the CDU that repeatedly voted for the nonsensical embargoes against Russia that led to prices rising...

11

Feb

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy (debate)

Madam President, So, the EU now wants to fight poverty, creating it itself; This is best seen in Germany. The formerly rich, industrially tart country now had to recoup 107 billion euros in debt in order to implement the agenda that comes here from Brussels. The poison comes from Brussels. Take a look at what we spent the money on: €50 billion for migration, another €16 billion for nuclear phase-out, €18 billion for EEG support, and support for electromobility – these are all green dreams, which in turn came from Brussels – and another €15 billion for Ukraine. And that doesn't even include all the war funding you are planning and operating here. We don't need that, dear friends. We need strong, sovereign countries that are committed to citizens, to their needs, not to a globalist agenda.

11

Feb

2026

Questions SK

Watch

Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate)

Mr. Kaliňák, you are talking about these pensions, about subsidies. Here a green colleague Freund from Germany made such a viral video, where he stood in front of the villa Amonra, and there he also criticized how these subsidies are being misused in Slovakia. You represent Robert Fico's government here? Could you explain how it is?

11

Feb

2026

Questions SK

Watch

Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate)

Mrs Laššáková, you spoke about the former government and Slovakia is now being criticised. I wanted to ask: We know that the former government suppressed the demonstrations in the times of the Corona. Batons, tear gas were used, protesters were beaten. Even the former president of the police, Lučanský, died in custody. This was the case under the previous government. How is it now in Fico's reign? Does it also suppress anti-government demonstrations in this drastic way?

11

Feb

2026

Speeches DE

Watch

State violence in Minneapolis and the rule of law in the United States (topical debate)

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen. At the request of the Socialists, we should discuss the rule of law in the USA – what a mockery! It is precisely this European Parliament that has refused to discuss this week what the European Commission has done in the last ten years. Namely: For ten years, the European Commission has censored legitimate political opinions and facts, while also paying the media to defame EU critics. We receive this information from Washington, the United States; This was done there, as opposed to here. We are refusing to discuss and prefer to speak in plenary about two-year-old Draghi reports or about the inclusion of Andorra and San Marino – yes, that is important to us. You're bothered that Trump is finally proving that you've been lying for years: Remigration is possible, deportations are possible. We also need ICE in Europe. We need to crack down and deport the criminal aliens. That's a role model that bothers you. And that's why you started this discussion here and let left-wing extremists like the Salis speak here at the desk. This is a mockery of democracy.

18

Dec

2025

Questions DE

Watch

European Democracy Shield – very large online platform algorithms, foreign interference and the spread of disinformation (debate)

17

Dec

2025

Questions DE

Watch

Preventing sexual harassment in public institutions: latest revelations and resignations in Spain and institutional responses (debate)

Thank you, dear colleague, for allowing me to ask you this question. Her Spanish colleagues from the extreme left and also from the socialists have spoken here against machismo, against sexual harassment of women. At the same time, however, they promote illegal migration to Europe, precisely by men from foreign cultures who not only commit sexual harassment in the workplace – mostly not at all, because they do not have the jobs at all – but rape women in the open street. We have always had mass rapes in recent years. So how do you explain this hypocrisy of the left? Why do they do that?

17

Dec

2025

Questions CS

Watch

Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)

Colleague, you said two things. First, that you hope that the United States of America will continue to support the war in Ukraine, and then that we should be in solidarity and use the Russian money here in the European Union to support Ukraine. You haven't read a new one National Security Strategy United States of America? There it is clearly stated that NATO will not expand in Europe. And you can see that President Trump has been trying to end this conflict since the beginning of his administration. Then how can you expect it? The second question is: Do you want to give away our taxpayers' money?

17

Dec

2025

Questions SK

Watch

Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)

Mr President, but my colleague, how do you explain this? We have listened here for a long time, precisely from Mrs von der Leyen and their colleagues, that Europe is fighting in the interest of Ukrainians. And now surveys, independent surveys in Ukraine show that over 70% of Ukrainians already want an end to this war. And the very people who told us here that we actually stand up for the Ukrainians, so now, despite the fact that the Ukrainians want to end this conflict, they are telling us here now that the conflict needs to be prolonged, that we have to finance it with the money of our taxpayers. How do you explain that?

17

Dec

2025

Questions DE

Watch

Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)

I will ask in German. Dear colleague, can I ask you in German? It's great! You have just stated that Belgium does not want to deal with this injustice on its own, the Russian assets to confiscate. And you are talking about a just solution, because you are already waiting for us to lose a legal dispute with the Russian Federation, which you simply want to distribute to everyone. Is this the socialist way of thinking that if we commit injustice, the others should just pay for it?

16

Dec

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

EU Defence Readiness (joint debate)

Mr President, dear disciples, I would like to quote the new national strategy of the United States of America. A large European majority wants peace, but this desire is not implemented by the governing politicians because they ignore the democratic will. Yes, this is for everyone who wants to upgrade here. I wonder: Why do you want to upgrade so massively? We haven't had an opponent in Europe in 30 years. Since the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, there has been no threat to Europe. And you have successfully – successfully through NATO enlargement – built Russia into the new enemy. You keep trying. That is why, by the way, you also want to continue the war and continue to finance it, so that you can simply maintain this enemy image. (Remark by Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann when microphone is switched off) Do you speak for your associations, which you represent, the military industry? As a lobbyist? Or are you sitting here as a member of parliament? I quote the official American government. And she's right, and that's what hits you in the Mark. I am telling you that the only threat we have in Europe is illegal migration. And you better build for the 250 billion...

8

Oct

2025

Answers DE

Watch

Promoting EU digital rules: protecting European sovereignty (debate)

Mr. Sieper, not at all, because the Czech secret service did not do that at all. What they say does not exist. I asked them to do it, they never did. You should know – it has now been published several times – that it was a campaign financed by NATO circles to discredit several politicians who opposed the war in Ukraine. Meanwhile, it is also known that the media that drove this campaign are tied up in the OCCRP and that they were secretly paid. So, you should do more justice to your party's name and exercise sanity and do some research before asking questions.

8

Oct

2025

Speeches DE

Watch

Promoting EU digital rules: protecting European sovereignty (debate)

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen. The EU Commission now wants to oblige providers of chat services to search messages, photos, videos on users' devices. And that is what you call the defence of European sovereignty? I think I'm falling from the chair, dear colleague. If you want to defend Europe's sovereignty, then defend the external border or defend our infrastructure, which was blown up with Nord Stream 2, but don't try censorship laws. What you are proposing here is the end of confidential digital communication in Europe, and the mainstream media now sees it that way. The FAZ has even criticized that it is worse than the Chinese control system, and you should keep that in mind. They are violating the fundamental rights of our people. When chat control comes, it's the end of privacy in Europe. In conclusion, I just want to say: An EU Commission President, who does not want to push out her own chat protocols to the billion-dollar deal with Pfizer, now calls for total surveillance of all 450 million EU citizens. Good thing we have a vote of no confidence against them tomorrow – twice.